The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue
Abstract
The 'visual' acuity of blind persons perceiving information through a newly developed human-machine interface, with an array of electrical stimulators on the tongue, has been quantified using a standard Ophthalmological test (Snellen Tumbling E). Acuity without training averaged 20/860. This doubled with 9 h of training. The interface may lead to practical devices for persons with sensory loss such as blindness, and offers a means of exploring late brain plasticity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, their participants reported that they located the objects in space rather than at the stimulation site, an example of externalization.”
From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Sampaio, Maris and Bach-y-Rita (2001)
In the citing paper
“Participants performed better than in experiments with tactile SSDs (Chebat et al., 2007, Sampaio et al., 2001), retinal prostheses (Zrenner et al., 2010) and 55% showed acuity higher than the threshold for blindness (see also Levy-Tzedek, Riemer, & Amedi, 2014).”
From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Sampaio et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“Sampaio, Maris and Bach-y-Rita (2001) found that acuity, measured with a haptic rendering of a Snellen visual acuity chart with a tongue-based SSD was 20/860 on average but doubled after 9 h of training.”
From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Sampaio, Maris and Bach-y-Rita (2001)
Citations
Cites
Vision substitution by tactile image projection
BACH-Y-RITA, P., COLLINS, C. C., SAUNDERS, F. A., WHITE, B., & SCADDEN, L. (1969) · Nature · doi:10.1038/221963a0 · Cited by 956
Self-citationPlasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers
Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Torres, F. (1993) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/116.1.39 · Cited by 654
Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution
Bach‐y‐Rita, P. (1972) · Cited by 404
Self-citationForm perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note.
Bach‐y‐Rita, P., Kaczmarek, K. A., Tyler, M. E., & Garcia-Lara, J. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 338
Self-citationBrain mechanisms in sensory substitution
Krieg, W. J. S. (1973) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(73)90016-3 · Cited by 337
Veraart, C., Volder, A. D., Wanet-Defalque, M.-C., Bol, A., Michel, C., & Goffinet, A. M. (1990) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)90735-t · Cited by 203
High metabolic activity in the visual cortex of early blind human subjects
Wanet-Defalque, M.-C., Veraart, C., Volder, A. D., Metz, R., Michel, C. J., Dooms, G., & Goffinet, A. M. (1988) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(88)90896-7 · Cited by 201
Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device
De Volder, A. G., Catalan-Ahumada, M., Robert, A., Bol, A., Labar, D., Coppens, A., Michel, C., & Veraart, C. (1999) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01275-5 · Cited by 114
Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue
Bach‐y‐Rita, P. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 84
Self-citationNonsynaptic diffusion, neurotransmission and late brain reorganization
Niedermeyer, E. (1995) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(95)90290-2 · Cited by 53
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Woods, 1985, Early blindness reorganizes auditory processing in humans, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 11, 449
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface
Bach-y-Rita, P., & W. Kercel, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013 · Cited by 858
Self-citationNew treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Elbert, T. R. (2002) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn754 · Cited by 662
Ptito, M. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh380 · Cited by 310
Neural Plasticity and Consciousness
Hurley, S. L., & Noë, A. (2003) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1023308401356 · Cited by 310
Nánay, B. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Sampaio, E., Maris, S., & Bach-y-Rita, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Strasbourg (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Sampaio, Eliana
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 908
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-207
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085075010
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- neuroplasticity, visual acuity, blind people, human-machine interaction, tactile perception, sensory substitution, Snellen test, training effects, sensory impairment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electronic Data Processing, Blindness, Brain, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Psychomotor Performance, Tongue, Touch, User-Computer Interface, Video Recording, Visual Acuity, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
