Cited by 858Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface

Bach-y-Rita, Paul, W. Kercel, Stephen·2003·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Recent advances in the instrumentation technology of sensory substitution have presented new opportunities to develop systems for compensation of sensory loss. In sensory substitution (e.g. of sight or vestibular function), information from an artificial receptor is coupled to the brain via a human-machine interface. The brain is able to use this information in place of that usually transmitted from an intact sense organ. Both auditory and tactile systems show promise for practical sensory substitution interface sites. This research provides experimental tools for examining brain plasticity and has implications for perceptual and cognition studies more generally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Available evidence suggests that there is great potential in sensory substitution methods.

    “Notably, although the available evidence suggests that there is great potential in sensory substitution methods (see Bach-y-Rita & Kercel, 2003; Merabet & Pascual-Leone, 2010; Proulx et al., 2016; Shull & Damian, 2015; Nagel et al., 2005, for reviews)”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Bach-y-Rita & Kercel, 2003

  • Even if two-point thresholds are exceeded, perceptual interpretation can compensate, functionally resulting in better resolution than 2-point thresholds dictate.

    “Note however that even if two-point thresholds are exceeded it is possible that perceptual interpretation can compensate for this (see e.g. Novich & Eagleman 2015; and discussion in Bach-Y Rita, 2003). The pattern of stimulation may be detected and perceptual interpretation can functionally result in better resolution than 2-point thresholds dictate (Bach-Y-Rita & Kercel, 2003).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Bach-Y Rita, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bach-y-Rita, P., & W. Kercel, S.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
541-546
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131294823
Cited by
858
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 36
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
sensory substitution, human-machine interaction, neuroplasticity, synthetic receptors, perceptual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review