Cited by 114Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device

De Volder, Anne G, Catalan-Ahumada, Mitzi, Robert, Annie, Bol, Anne, Labar, Daniel, Coppens, Ann, Michel, Christian, Veraart, Claude·1999·Brain Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the neural networks involved when using an ultrasonic echolocation device, which is a substitution prosthesis for blindness through audition. Using positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose, regional brain glucose metabolism was measured in the occipital cortex of early blind subjects and blindfolded controls who were trained to use this prosthesis. All subjects were studied under two different activation conditions: (i) during an auditory control task, (ii) using the ultrasonic echolocation device in a spatial distance and direction evaluation task. Results showed that the abnormally high metabolism already observed in early blind occipital cortex at rest [C. Veraart, A.G. De Volder, M.C. Wanet-Defalque, A. Bol, C. Michel, A.M. Goffinet, Glucose utilization in human visual cortex is, respectively elevated and decreased in early versus late blindness, Brain Res. 510 (1990) 115-121.] was also present during the control task and showed a trend to further increase during the use of the ultrasonic echolocation device. This specific difference in occipital cortex activity between the two tasks was not observed in control subjects. The metabolic recruitment of the occipital cortex in early blind subjects using a substitution prosthesis could reflect a concurrent stimulation of functional cross-modal sensory connections. Given the unfamiliarity of the task, it could be interpreted as a prolonged plasticity in the occipital cortex early deprived of visual afferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01275-5

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Volder, A. G., Catalan-Ahumada, M., Robert, A., Bol, A., Labar, D., Coppens, A., Michel, C., & Veraart, C.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Veraart, Claude
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
826
Issue
1
Pages
128-134
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044281297
Cited by
114
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
sensory substitution, early blindness, occipital cortex, ultrasonic echolocation, brain glucose metabolism, cross-modal plasticity, visual deprivation, auditory prosthesis
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blindness, Glucose, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Sensory Deprivation, Sound Localization, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Ultrasonics, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review