Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative evaluation of blood-brain barrier permeability following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats

Open access
Belayev, Ludmila, Busto, Raul, Zhao, Weizhao, Ginsberg, Myron D·1996·Brain Research

Abstract

A sensitive quantitative fluorescence method was used to explore the time course and regional pattern of blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with halothane and subjected to 2 h of temporary MCAo by retrograde insertion of an intraluminal nylon suture, coated with poly-L-lysine, through the external carotid artery into the internal carotid artery and MCA. Damage to the BBB was judged by extravasation of Evans Blue (EB) dye, which was administered either 2, 3, 24 or 48 h after onset of MCAo. Fluorometric quantitation of EB was performed 1 or 2 h later in six brain regions. Cerebral infarction volumes were quantitated from histopathological material at 72 h. EB extravasation first became grossly visible in the ipsilateral caudoputamen and neocortex following 3 h of MCAo, was grossly unapparent at 24-26 h, and was maximal at 48-50 h. Fluorescence quantitation confirmed that BBB opening was absent at 2-3 h but present at all later times. In the hemisphere ipsilateral to MCAo, a 179% mean increase in extravasation of EB (compared to sham rats) was measured at 4 h, 407% at 5 h, 311% at 26 h and 264% at 50 h. (in each case, P < 0.05 vs. sham). The volume of infarcted tissue at 72 h in this model was 163.6 +/- 7.7 mm3. Our results indicate that an initial, acute disruption of the BBB occurs between 3 and 5 h following MCAo, and that a later, more widespread increase in regional BBB permeability is present at 48 h. Regional measurement of Evans Blue extravasation offers a precise means of quantitating BBB disruption in focal cerebral ischemia; this method will be of considerable utility in assessing the BBB-protective properties of pharmacological agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00815-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Belayev, L., Busto, R., Zhao, W., & Ginsberg, M. D.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
739
Issue
1-2
Pages
88-96
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060560910
Cited by
506
References
2
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.