The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the development of voluntary and reflexive components in human saccade generation
Abstract
The saccadic performance of a large number (n = 281) of subjects of different ages (8-70 years) was studied applying two saccade tasks: the prosaccade overlap (PO) task and the antisaccade gap (AG) task. From the PO task, the mean reaction times and the percentage of express saccades were determined for each subject. From the AG task, the mean reaction time of the correct antisaccades and of the erratic prosaccades were measured. In addition, we determined the error rate and the mean correction time, i.e. the time between the end of the first erratic prosaccade and the following corrective antisaccade. These variables were measured separately for stimuli presented (in random order) at the right or left side. While strong correlations were seen between variables for the right and left sides, considerable side asymmetries were obtained from many subjects. A factor analysis revealed that the seven variables (six eye movement variables plus age) were mainly determined by only two factors, V and F. The V factor was dominated by the variables from the AG task (reaction time, correction time, error rate) the F factor by variables from the PO task (reaction time, percentage express saccades) and the reaction time of the errors (prosaccades!) from the AG task. The relationship between the percentage number of express saccades and the percentage number of errors was completely asymmetric: high numbers of express saccades were accompanied by high numbers of errors but not vice versa. Only the variables in the V factor covaried with age. A fast decrease of the antisaccade reaction time (by 50 ms), of the correction times (by 70 ms) and of the error rate (from 60 to 22%) was observed between age 9 and 15 years, followed by a further period of slower decrease until age 25 years. The mean time a subject needed to reach the side opposite to the stimulus as required by the antisaccade task decreased from approximately 350 to 250 ms until age 15 years and decreased further by 20 ms before it increased again to approximately 280 ms. At higher ages, there was a slight indication for a return development. Subjects with high error rates had long antisaccade latencies and needed a long time to reach the opposite side on error trials. The variables obtained from the PO task varied also significantly with age but by smaller amounts. The results are discussed in relation to the subsystems controlling saccade generation: a voluntary and a reflex component the latter being suppressed by active fixation. Both systems seem to develop differentially. The data offer a detailed baseline for clinical studies using the pro- and antisaccade tasks as an indication of functional impairments, circumscribed brain lesions, neurological and psychiatric diseases and cognitive deficits.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In concert with motivation, inhibitory control, which is a core component of executive function, continues to mature through adolescence (Fischer et al., 1997, Luna et al., 2004, Munoz et al., 1998)”
From Effects of incentives, age, and behavior on brain activation during inhibitory control: a longitudinal fMRI study (2015) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 1997
Citations
Cites
Harman, H. H. (1960) · Cited by 5,148
Andersen, E. B., & Harman, H. H. (1968) · Revue de l Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute · doi:10.2307/1401485 · Cited by 3,206
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061
Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades
Bruce, C. J., & Goldberg, M. E. (1985) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.603 · Cited by 1,415
Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions
Hallett, P. E. (1978) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90218-3 · Cited by 1,262
Guitton, D., Buchtel, H. A., & Douglas, R. M. (1985) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235863 · Cited by 1,008
Human express saccades: extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements
Fischer, B., & Ramsperger, E. (1984) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00231145 · Cited by 724
Self-citationExpress saccades and visual attention
Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00031575 · Cited by 697
Self-citationEffects of Components of Displacement-Step Stimuli Upon Latency for Saccadic Eye Movement
Saslow, M. G. (1967) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.57.001024 · Cited by 678
Visual Motion Processing and Sensory-Motor Integration for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
Lisberger, S. G., Morris, E. J., & Tychsen, L. (1987) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.000525 · Cited by 651
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fischer, B. and Boch, R., Cerebral Cortex. In R. Carpenter (Ed.), Vision and Visual Dysfunction: Vol. 8: Eye movements, Macmillan, London, UK, 1991, pp. 277–296.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x · Cited by 2,692
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006 · Cited by 2,226
Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement
Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1345 · Cited by 1,501
Maturation of Cognitive Processes From Late Childhood to Adulthood
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00745.x · Cited by 1,351
Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence
Paus, T. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.008 · Cited by 1,348
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, B., Biscaldi, M., & Gezeck, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Burkhart
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 754
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 285-297
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159869501
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- saccade generation, express saccades, age-related development, side-to-side asymmetry, saccade latency, oculomotor control
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oculomotor Muscles, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Reflex, Saccades, Muscle Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review