Cited by 164Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anatomical basis for cannabinoid-induced antinociception as revealed by intracerebral microinjections

Abstract

Cannabinoids suppress behavioral and neurophysiological responses to noxious stimuli in rodents when administered systemically. The purpose of this study was to extend previous studies of the site of cannabinoid analgesia. Rats were tested in the tail flick test before and after microinjections of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55, 212-2 (5 microg) into one of 17 different brain regions. WIN55,212-2 significantly elevated tail-flick latencies when injected into the amygdala, the lateral posterior and submedius regions of the thalamus, the superior colliculus and the noradrenergic A5 region. By contrast, pain behavior was unaffected by microinjections of the cannabinoid into the other 11 areas examined (prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, lateral hypothalamus, substantia nigra, cuneiform nucleus, anterior pretectal, intralaminar, parafasicular, posterior, thalamic nuclei, as well as the ventral medial, ventral lateral nuclei in the posterior thalamus).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01368-7

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. G. Paxinos, C., Watson, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, compact 3rd edn., Academic Press, San Diego, 1997.
  2. Tsou, 1962, Analgesic effect of intraventricular or intracerebral microinjection of morphine, Acta Physiologica Sinica, 25, 119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Martin, W. J., Coffin, P. O., Attias, E., Balinsky, M., Tsou, K., & Walker, J. M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, J.Michael
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
822
Issue
1-2
Pages
237-242
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009864778
Cited by
164
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns033247-08, 5k02da000375-09, 1f31da005617-01)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA05617, K02 DA-00375)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 33247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
cannabinoid analgesia, antinociception, WIN 55,212-2, intracerebral microinjection, amygdala, thalamus, superior colliculus, tail-flick test, pain behavior, cannabinoid receptor agonists
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Analgesics, Animals, Brain Chemistry, Cannabinoids, Male, Microinjections, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Nociceptors, Norepinephrine, Pain, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, Superior Colliculi, Thalamus, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Benzoxazines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review