Cited by 500Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Does the cannabinoid dronabinol reduce central pain in multiple sclerosis? Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial

Open access
Svendsen, Kristina B, Jensen, Troels S, Bach, Flemming W·2004·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the oral synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol dronabinol on central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 24 patients aged between 23 and 55 years with multiple sclerosis and central pain. INTERVENTION: Orally administered dronabinol at a maximum dose of 10 mg daily or corresponding placebo for three weeks (15-21 days), separated by a three week washout period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Median spontaneous pain intensity (numerical rating scale) in the last week of treatment. RESULTS: Median spontaneous pain intensity was significantly lower during dronabinol treatment than during placebo treatment (4.0 (25th to 75th centiles 2.3 to 6.0) v 5.0 (4.0 to 6.4), P = 0.02), and median pain relief score (numerical rating scale) was higher (3.0 (0 to 6.7) v> 0 (0 to 2.3), P = 0.035). The number needed to treat for 50% pain relief was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 24.8). On the SF-36 quality of life scale, the two items bodily pain and mental health indicated benefits from active treatment compared with placebo. The number of patients with adverse events was higher during active treatment, especially in the first week of treatment. The functional ability of the multiple sclerosis patients did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Dronabinol has a modest but clinically relevant analgesic effect on central pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Adverse events, including dizziness, were more frequent with dronabinol than with placebo during the first week of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38149.566979.ae

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research into oral cannabinoid use in the management of chronic and neuropathic pain has been encouraging.

    “Research into oral cannabinoid use in the management of chronic and neuropathic pain has been encouraging.18,32”

    From Nabilone for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. (2008) · cites this paper as [32]

  • Dronabinol improved median radiating pain intensity and pressure threshold, sleep quality, spasms, and spasticity in multiple sclerosis patients.

    “Additionally, this drug improved median radiating pain intensity and pressure threshold,134 sleep quality, spasms, and spasticity143 in MS patients.”
  • Dronabinol reduced spontaneous pain intensity as measured with a numerical rating scale over a treatment period of 3 weeks and improved overall pain ratings on the category-rating scale over a treatment period of 15 weeks.

    “Dronabinol reduced spontaneous pain intensity as measured with a numerical rating scale (NRS) over a treatment period of 3 weeks134 and improved overall pain ratings on the category-rating scale over a treatment period of 15 weeks143.”
  • Unwanted side-effects, in contrast to analgesic effects, may undergo tolerance.

    “However, unwanted side-effects, in contrast to analgesic effects, may undergo tolerance.134”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]31. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Task Force of Taxonomy. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svendsen, K. B., Jensen, T. S., & Bach, F. W.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Bach, Flemming W
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-07-16
Volume
329
Issue
7460
Pages
253
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2114826780
Cited by
500
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 29
FWCI
27.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dronabinol, multiple sclerosis, central pain, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabinoids, analgesia, pain intensity, quality of life, adverse events, dizziness
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Cannabinoids, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Dronabinol, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review