The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creating the boundaryless organization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In stakeholder networks with a high dispersion of control, the boundaries between the firm and its stakeholders become blurred.
“In stakeholder networks with a high dispersion of control the boundaries between the firm and its stakeholders becomes blurred (Ashkenas 1999).”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Ashkenas 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CROSSROADS—Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms
Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0561 · Cited by 439
The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors
Voelpel, S. C., Leibold, M., & Tekie, E. B. (2004) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/1469701042000212669 · Cited by 308
“The discontinuities that differentiate the ‘new’ economy from the ‘old’ are numerous but to mention the prominent ones, these include: digitization of information (Viscio and Paternack, 1996; Tapscott, 1997); the ‘virtual space’ where economic transactions are increasingly taking place (Kelly, 1998); relying more on k…”
BackgroundBoundary work in knowledge teams.
Faraj, S. A., & Yan, A. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014367 · Cited by 332
Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities
Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0424-y · Cited by 257
“In stakeholder networks with a high dispersion of control the boundaries between the firm and its stakeholders becomes blurred (Ashkenas 1999).”
Repatriating knowledge: variables influencing the “transfer” process
Oddou, G. R., Osland, J. S., & Blakeney, R. N. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400402 · Cited by 208
“Ashkenas (1999) argues that individuals with a global mindset naturally help encourage informationsharing within the organization and across organizational entities and countries.”
BackgroundOrganizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational FormsPreprint
Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.17169/refubium-24878 · Cited by 168
Cellular manufacturing for small businesses: key cultural factors that impact the conversion process
Yauch, C. A., & Steudel, H. J. (2002) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00029-3 · Cited by 86
Zhang, X., Gao, C., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101870 · Cited by 92
Organizational Learning and Green Innovation: Does Environmental Proactivity Matter?
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Li, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103737 · Cited by 72
Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world?
Pateman, H., & Cahoon, S. (2010) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.005 · Cited by 32
Cross-hierarchical interconnectivity: forms, mechanisms and transformation of leadership culture
Fliaster, A. (2004) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500019 · Cited by 29
“…careers in centralised, hierarchical structures must also cross powerful psychological barriers, shifting from the traditional mindset of command and control, on the one hand, and obedience and passivity, on the other, to a new focus of collaboration and interconnectivity (e.g., Ashkenas, 1999).”
BackgroundIntegration through cross-functional teams in a service company
de Oliveira, E. A., Pimenta, M. L., Hilletofth, P., & Eriksson, D. (2016) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-01-2016-0014 · Cited by 25
“Company size: the larger the organization, the greater the complexity of the processes and the necessity to integrate functions (Ashkenas, 1999; Galpin et al., 2007); 2.”
BackgroundBoundaries and organizations: a few considerations for research
Vakkayil, J. D. (2012) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/19348831211227837 · Cited by 23
“It has also been pointed out that work has indeed become “boundaryless” (Kerr and Ulrich, 1995; Ashkenas, 1999). Ironically, such conceptualizations have led to an increased interest in boundaries and contributed to the realization that they need to be re-examined in the light of new realities. Halley (1997) asserts t…”
BackgroundManufacturing SMEs, network governance and global supply chains
Cragg, T., McNamara, T., Descubes, I., & Guerin, F. (2019) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-10-2019-0334 · Cited by 25
Span of management: concept analysis
Meyer, R. M. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04635.x · Cited by 20
Reconciling Hierarchy and Democracy
Clarke, M., & Butcher, D. (2006) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507606067169 · Cited by 19
“Reconciling these is key to collective organizational endeavour being sustained (Cludts, 1999), yet attempting to do so primarily through top-down decision making is not feasible (Ashkenas, 1999).”
BackgroundToward Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?
Ringel, L., Hiller, P., & Zietsma, C. (2018) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20180000057001 · Cited by 21
“From this perspective, classical bureaucratic structures that outline long-term rules, standards, hierarchies and categories of membership are seen as an impediment (Ashkenas, 1999; Ashkenas, Ulrich, Jick, & Kerr, 2002).”
BackgroundThe role of paradoxical logic in innovation: The case of Intel
Norman, P. M., Palich, L. E., Livingstone, L. P., & Carini, G. R. (2004) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004 · Cited by 17
Managerial levers in cultivating new mental space for business innovation
Leibold, M., Voelpel, S. C., & Tekie, E. B. (2004) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v35i4.669 · Cited by 17
“While traditionally focus has been on size, control, role clarity and specialization, in this stage and age in order to survive and compete in the ‘new’ business environment, organizations need to be adept, fast and flexible by networking and forming relationships with members that are part of the value creating syste…”
BackgroundReview of workflows of emergency shutdown systems in the Norwegian oil and gas industry
Zhu, P., Liyanage, J. P., Panesar, S. S., et al. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.037 · Cited by 14
Archaic Agencies, Muddled Missions, and Conservation in the 21st Century
Samson, F. B., & Knopf, F. L. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0869:aammac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 11
Permeability in Coworking-Spaces as an Innovation Facilitator
Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Brem, A. (2019) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · doi:10.23919/picmet.2019.8893737 · Cited by 6
Pates, G. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-35736-5_7 · Cited by 2
Alaca, E., & Yılmaz, B. (2021) · Bilgi Yönetimi · doi:10.33721/by.927734 · Cited by 1
The Role of the Commons in Maritime and Outer Space
Roe, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31613-5_5 · Cited by 1
Identifying organizational factors affecting individual knowledge creation
Jafari, S. M., Irani, H. R., & Rezaei, D. (2017) · International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering · doi:10.1109/icnte.2017.7947920 · Cited by 1
Building change-capable public organisations
Thompson, R. M. (2008) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Permeability in Coworking Spaces as an Innovation Facilitator
Bouncken, R. B., & Aslam, M. M. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80455-029-820231006 · Cited by 1
Pateman, H. (2015) · UTAS Research Repository · doi:10.25959/23242328 · Cited by 1
Siilot organisaatiokulttuurisena ilmentymänä
Kivekäs, R. (2014) · Doria (University of Helsinki)
Sinerjik Yönetsel Uygulamaların Strateji Bileşenleri Üzerindeki Etkisine ilişkin Bir Araştırma
Pinar, Y. D. D. A. H., & Turan, Y. D. D. M. (2010) · Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Farbood, S. (2015) · Arth prabandh: A Journal of Economics and Management
Vansteenkiste, S., Kovalenko, M., Verbruggen, M., Mortelmans, D., Vos, A. D., Forrier, A., & Dries, N. (2015) · Lirias
Chauvet, V., Aix-Marseille-3 Univ., 1. P. (. I. D. D. E., & Aix-Marseille-3 Univ., 1. P. (. C. D. E. D. R. S. L. O. E. L. G. (2001) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
Roe, M. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_4
External boundary permeability and inclusive innovation: the moderating role of dual governance
Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Feng, T., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Bai, J. (2024) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2024.2323574
“Referring to the research of Nason et al. (2019) and Ashkenas (1999), we designed seven items to measure the external boundary permeability.”
Adil Dünya İnancı Kuramına Yönelik Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz: Pazarlama Alanı İçin Bazı Çıkarımlar
Ay, U. (2024) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub524.c2167
İşletmeciliğin Geleceği: Sınırsız Organizasyonlar
Heybet, K., & Duran, C. (2024) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub524.c2163
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashkenas, R.
- Corresponding author
- Ashkenas, Ron
- Venue
- Business Horizons
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5-10
- ISSN
- 0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003389167
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Business Horizons (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- boundaryless organization, organizational structure, organizational design, organizational boundaries, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
