CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Innovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement and Organizational StudiesBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The role of paradoxical logic in innovation: The case of Intel

Norman, Patricia M, Palich, Leslie E, Livingstone, Linda Parrack, Carini, Gary R·2004·The Journal of High Technology Management Research
DOI 10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Logic paradigms are deeply rooted underlying assumptions that are used to frame thinking, decisions, and processes. We compare the fundamental assumptions of two logic paradigms—formal logic and paradoxical logic—and discuss the implications of these assumptions for innovation and change. Using Intel as an example, we suggest that paradoxical logic can enhance the innovative processes of high-technology firms, can help these firms to deal effectively with change, and, when combined with formal logic, can enhance firm performance. We derive three propositions from our analysis of Intel to guide future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some successful firms actively seek tensions to improve decision making.

    “This is supported by studies that show that some successful firms actively seek tensions to improve decision making (Eisenhardt et al. 1997;Norman et al. 2004).”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Norman et al. 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Norman, P. M., Palich, L. E., Livingstone, L. P., & Carini, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Pepperdine University (US)
Corresponding author
Norman, Patricia M
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of High Technology Management Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
51-71
ISSN
1047-8310 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004
OpenAlex
W2038239781
Cited by
17
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
The Journal of High Technology Management Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
formal logic, innovation, organizational change, high-tech enterprises, firm performance, Intel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review