CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Fluid Dynamics and MixingFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

A model for turbulent binary breakup of dispersed fluid particles

Hagesaether, Lars, Jakobsen, Hugo A, Svendsen, Hallvard F·2002·Chemical Engineering Science
DOI 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00197-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00197-5

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Haegeaether et al. [279] start from the Luo and Svendsen [274] break-up model and improved it, criticizing that the Luo and Svendsen model assumes particle fragmentation occurs when an eddy possesses enough turbulent kinetic energy, which implies breakage every time an eddy collides with a fluid particle and leads to a large and most probably unreasonable number of break-up events.

    “Haegeaether et al. [279] also start from the Luo and Svendsen [274] break-up model and improved it. The main criticism of the Luo and Svendsen model is that the model is based on the assumption that particle fragmentation occurs when an eddy possesses enough turbulent kinetic energy. This implies that breakage occurs every time an eddy collides with a fluid particle since theoretically there is”

    From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [279]

  • Haegeaether et al. [279] propose a new breakup criterion based on the energy density and the surface energy criterion, where the energy density of an eddy must be higher or at least equal to the energy density of the daughter particles, and the new model removes the deficiency of the Luo and Svendsen model by setting a limit to the minimum size of the daughter particle.

    “To remove this deficiency, the authors propose a new breakup criterion based on the energy density and the surface energy criterion. The energy density criterion briefly states that the energy density of an eddy must be higher or at least equal to the energy density of the daughter particles. The new model removes the deficiency of the model of Luo and Svendsen [274] by setting a limit to the”

    From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [279]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hagesaether, L., Jakobsen, H. A., & Svendsen, H. F.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Jakobsen, Hugo A
ORCID
Svendsen, Hallvard F
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
57
Issue
16
Pages
3251-3267
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00197-5
OpenAlex
W2016466291
Cited by
144
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
population balance model, particle coalescence, small particles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review