Cited by 260Fluid Dynamics and MixingFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

A novel theoretical breakup kernel function for bubbles/droplets in a turbulent flow

Wang, Tiefeng, Wang, Jinfu, Jin, Yong·2003·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2003.07.009

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Wang, J., & Jin, Y.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jinfu
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
58
Issue
20
Pages
4629-4637
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082694703
Cited by
260
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
bubble breakup, droplet breakup, turbulent flow, capillary pressure, surface energy, energy dissipation rate, two-phase flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review