Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arteriovenous differences in plasma concentration of nicotine and catecholamines and related cardiovascular effects after smoking, nicotine nasal spray, and intravenous nicotine*

Gourlay, Steven G., Benowitz, Neal L.·1997·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delivery of a high concentration bolus of nicotine through the arterial circulation is believed to be an important determinant of the addictive, behavioral, and physiologic effects of nicotine. To better understand the pharmacologic features of nicotine with different routes of administration, we measured arterial and venous plasma concentrations of nicotine, cotinine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine after tobacco smoking, intravenous nicotine infusion, and use of a nicotine nasal spray. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Arterial and venous blood samples were drawn simultaneously from 12 male smokers. Six subjects received a single dose of 1 mg nicotine nasal spray, and six subjects smoked cigarettes, one puff per minute for 10 minutes. All 12 subjects were administered nicotine as a 30-minute infusion beginning 70 minutes after administration of the nicotine nasal spray or commencement of smoking. RESULTS: The mean peak arterial plasma concentrations of nicotine (Cmax) after smoking or administration of nicotine nasal spray, or intravenous nicotine averaged twofold those of venous plasma. For nicotine nasal spray, the time to Cmax was much faster for arterial than for venous plasma (median, 5 versus 18 minutes, p < 0.01). Intravenous nicotine produced the greatest increase in plasma epinephrine concentration, although smoking had a greater chronotropic effect. Acute tolerance to the chronotropic effects of nicotine was suggested at pharmacodynamic analysis with venous nicotine concentrations, whereas analysis of arterial concentrations found the opposite--a time lag between plasma concentration and effect. CONCLUSION: Nicotine is rapidly absorbed from nicotine nasal spray. The Cmax of nicotine after smoking or administration of nicotine nasal spray, or intravenous nicotine is substantially higher in arterial than venous plasma. Acute tolerance to the chronotropic effects of nicotine is not apparent if arterial plasma concentrations are measured.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0009-9236(97)90124-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Gourlay, S. G., & Benowitz, N. L.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-10
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
453-463
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2064087046
Cited by
223
References
3
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arteriovenous differences in plasma concentration of nicotine and catecholamines and related cardiovascular effects after smoking, nicotine nasal spray, and intravenous nicotine*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0009-9236(97)90124-7
The paper
Gourlay, S. G., & Benowitz, N. L. (1997). Arteriovenous differences in plasma concentration of nicotine and catecholamines and related cardiovascular effects after smoking, nicotine nasal spray, and intravenous nicotine*. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9236(97)90124-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.