The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reuniting perception and conception
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Searle, J. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005756 · Cited by 6,954
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 · Cited by 3,010
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
Comments on Part I: Psychological essentialism
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989) · Similarity and Analogical Reasoning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863.009 · Cited by 674
(2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203062821 · Cited by 600
Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.6.1236 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000965 · Cited by 1,200
The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 · Cited by 1,032
Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers.
Casasanto, D. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0015854 · Cited by 871
Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36002-8 · Cited by 513
Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning
Rau, M. A. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9365-3 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 231-262
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154851383
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reuniting perception and conception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00047-4
- The paper
- Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00047-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
