Cited by 178Williams Syndrome ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Tracing syndrome-specific trajectories of attention across the lifespan.

CORNISH, K, SCERIF, G, KARMILOFFSMITH, A·2007·Cortex

Abstract

This paper maintains that studies of atypical attention targeting one particular age group are unlikely to be informative of syndrome-specific deficits and their developmental changes. We propose a new approach to the study of attentional deficits in genetic disorders, arguing for tracing cross-syndrome developmental trajectories from infancy through childhood to adulthood. Few studies have incorporated a developmental approach to determine whether the pattern of deficits and proficiencies remains constant across developmental time. Fewer still have included a cross-syndrome perspective to address these issues. Focusing on the cognitive domain of attention and its component parts, and using a cross-syndrome developmental perspective, the present set of studies compared the trajectories of different aspects of attention in three developmental disorders: Fragile X syndrome (FXS), Down syndrome (DS) and Williams syndrome (WS). Hitherto, these syndromes have all been reported as displaying serious "attentional deficits" above those expected in the general population. We predicted that, when one considers in greater detail subcomponent processes of attention, then ostensibly common difficulties do not necessarily emerge from common developmental pathways. We addressed this question with two studies. The first focused on inhibitory control, orienting and selective attention in infants and toddlers, and the second concentrated on selective attention, sustained attention and inhibito…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70497-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive functioning impairments in Down syndrome include deficits in attention, inhibition, planning and organization, set-shifting, and self-monitoring.

    “The impairments in executive functioning include deficits in attention, inhibition, planning and organization, set-shifting, and self-monitoring, all of which are critical categories of intellectual function needed for independent living (Cornish et al., 2007; Abbeduto et al., 2008; Trezise et al., 2008; Lanfranchi et al., 2010; Breckenridge et al., 2013; Costanzo et al., 2013).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Cornish et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CORNISH, K., SCERIF, G., & KARMILOFFSMITH, A.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
CORNISH, K
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
672-685
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014269285
Cited by
178
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Fogarty International Center (R21 TW 06761-01, R21TW006761)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention, developmental trajectories, fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome, Williams syndrome, inhibitory control, orienting, selective attention, sustained attention, childhood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Child, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Infant, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reference Values, Saccades, Williams Syndrome, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review