Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recent crustal deformation and the earthquake cycle along the Ecuador–Colombia subduction zone

White, Scott M, Trenkamp, Robert, Kellogg, James N·2003·Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00535-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. S.P. Nishenko, Circum-Pacific Seismic Potential 1989-1999, U.S. Geol. Surv., 1989, 126 pp. · DOI
  2. Kanamori, 1982, Variable rupture mode of the subduction zone along the Ecuador-Colombia coast, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 1241
  3. Kelleher, 1972, Rupture zones of large South American earthquakes and some predictions, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 2087, 10.1029/JB077i011p02087 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Swenson, 1996, Historical 1942 Ecuador and 1942 Peru subduction earthquakes and earthquake cycles along Colombia-Ecuador and Peru subduction segments, PAGEOPH, 146, 67, 10.1007/BF00876670 · DOI
  5. Beck, 1984, The rupture process of the Great 1979 Colombia earthquake: Evidence for the asperity model, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 9281, 10.1029/JB089iB11p09281 · DOI
  6. Trenkamp, 2002, Wide plate margin deformation, southern Central America and northwestern South America, CASA GPS observations, J.S. Am. Earth Sci., 15, 157, 10.1016/S0895-9811(02)00018-4 · DOI
  7. J.N. Kellogg, V. Vega, Tectonic development of Panama, Costa Rica, and the Colombian Andes: Constraints from Global Positioning System geodetic studies and gravity, in: P. Mann (Ed.), Geologic and Tectonic Development of the Caribbean Plate Boundary in Southern Central America, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 295 (1995) 159–200. · DOI
  8. Gutscher, 1999, Tectonic segmentation of the North Andean margin: Impact of the Carnegie Ridge collision, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 168, 255, 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00060-6 · DOI
  9. Kellogg, 1990, Central and South America GPS geodesy; CASA Uno, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 195, 10.1029/GL017i003p00195 · DOI
  10. Freymueller, 1993, Plate motions in the North Andean region, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21853, 10.1029/93JB00520 · DOI
  11. Nur, 1974, Postseismic elastic rebound, Science, 183, 204, 10.1126/science.183.4121.204 · DOI
  12. Cohen, 1984, Postseismic deformation due to subcrustal viscoelastic relaxation following dip-slip earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 4538, 10.1029/JB089iB06p04538 · DOI
  13. Ruff, 2001, Stress on the seismogenic and deep creep plate interface during the earthquake cycle in subduction zones, Earth Planets Space, 53, 307, 10.1186/BF03352387 · DOI
  14. Masterlark, 2001, Homogeneous vs heterogeneous subduction zone models: coseismic and postseismic deformation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4047, 10.1029/2001GL013612 · DOI
  15. Melbourne, 2002, Rapid postseismic transients in subduction zones from continuous GPS, J. Geophys. Res., 107, E1, 10.1029/2001JB000555 · DOI
  16. Nakano, 1997, GPS observations of postseismic deformation for the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake, Japan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 503, 10.1029/97GL00375 · DOI
  17. LePichon, 1998, Deformation of the Japanese Islands and seismic coupling: an interpretation based on GSI permanent GPS observations, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 501, 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00595.x · DOI
  18. Pollitz, 1998, Joint estimation of afterslip rate and postseismic relaxation following the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 26975, 10.1029/98JB01554 · DOI
  19. Klotz, 2001, Earthquake cycle dominates contemporary crustal deformation in Central and Southern Andes, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 193, 437, 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00532-5 · DOI
  20. Freymueller, 2000, Spatial variations in present-day deformation, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and their implications, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 8079, 10.1029/1999JB900388 · DOI
  21. Mendoza, 1984, Seismicity associated with the great Colombia-Ecuador earthquakes of 1942, 1958, and 1979; implications for barrier models of earthquake rupture, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 577
  22. Papadimitriou, 1993, Long-term earthquake prediction along the western coast of South and Central America based on a time predictable model, Pure Appl. Geophys., 140, 301, 10.1007/BF00879409 · DOI
  23. Gomberg, 1994, Topography and tectonics of the central New Madrid seismic zone: Results of numerical experiments using a three-dimensional boundary-element program, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 20299, 10.1029/94JB00039 · DOI
  24. Savage, 1983, A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 4984, 10.1029/JB088iB06p04984 · DOI
  25. Meissner, 1976, Dynamics of the active plate boundary in Southwest Colombia according to recent geophysical measurements, Tectonophysics, 35, 115, 10.1016/0040-1951(76)90032-9 · DOI
  26. Pennington, 1981, Subduction of the eastern Panama Basin and seismotectonics of northwestern South America, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 10753, 10.1029/JB086iB11p10753 · DOI
  27. Tichelaar, 1991, Seismic coupling along the Chilean subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 11997, 10.1029/91JB00200 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Suarez, 1983, Seismicity, fault plane solutions, depth of faulting and active tectonics of the Andes of Peru, Ecuador, and southern Colombia, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10403, 10.1029/JB088iB12p10403 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tibaldi, 2000, Morphometry of late Pleistocene-Holocene faulting and volcanotectonic relationship in the southern Andes of Colombia, Tectonics, 19, 358, 10.1029/1999TC900063 · DOI
  30. Ego, 1996, Quaternary state of stress in the Northern Andes and the restraining bend model for the Ecuadorian Andes, Tectonophysics, 259, 101, 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00075-5 · DOI
  31. Piersanti, 1999, Postseismic deformation in Chile: Constraints on the asthenospheric viscosity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3157, 10.1029/1999GL005375 · DOI
  32. Dziewonski, 1981, Preliminary reference earth model (PREM), Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25, 297, 10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7 · DOI
  33. Wang, 2001, Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone, Earth Planets Space, 53, 295, 10.1186/BF03352386 · DOI
  34. Kenner, 2000, Postseismic deformation following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13195, 10.1029/2000JB900076 · DOI
  35. Piersanti, 2001, Active displacement field in the Suez-Sinai area: the role of postseismic deformation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 193, 13, 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00485-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
White, S. M., Trenkamp, R., & Kellogg, J. N.
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
216
Issue
3
Pages
231-242
ISSN
0012-821X
Cited by
52
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (EAR-8904657, EAR-8617485)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review