Cited by 272Culture, Economy, and Development StudiesEconomic Growth and ProductivityHistorical Economic and Social Studies

Did colonization matter for growth?

Open access
Bertocchi, Graziella, Canova, Fabio·2002·European Economic Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00195-7

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertocchi, G., & Canova, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Bertocchi, Graziella
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
1851-1871
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087030651
Cited by
272
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
European colonization, economic growth, colonial legacy, decolonization, economic penetration, growth heterogeneity, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, 20th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review