The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The FHA domain
Abstract
The forkhead‐associated (FHA) domain is a small protein module recently shown to recognize phosphothreonine epitopes on proteins. It is present in a diverse range of proteins in eukaryotic cells, such as kinases, phosphatases, kinesins, transcription factors, RNA‐binding proteins, and metabolic enzymes. It is also found in a number of bacterial proteins. This suggests that FHA domain‐mediated phospho‐dependent assembly of protein complexes is an ancient and widespread regulatory mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
Carney, J. P., Maser, R. S., Olivares, H., Davis, E. M., Le Beau, M., Yates, J. R., Hays, L., Morgan, W. F., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81175-7 · Cited by 1,226
The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis
Falck, J., Mailand, N., Syljuåsen, R. G., Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35071124 · Cited by 1,085
Shieh, S.-Y., Ahn, J., Tamai, K., Taya, Y., & Prives, C. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.3.289 · Cited by 972
Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G1by stabilizing p53
Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Appel, M., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.3.278 · Cited by 805
In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts
Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.590 · Cited by 500
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Usui, T., Ogawa, H., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00270-2 · Cited by 384
Checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks requires the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex
Grenon, M., Gilbert, C., & Lowndes, N. F. (2001) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0901-844 · Cited by 184
Tauchi, H., Kobayashi, J., Morishima, K.-I., Matsuura, S., Nakamura, A., Shiraishi, T., Ito, E., Masnada, D., Delia, D., & Komatsu, K. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c000578200 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Ki-67: more than a proliferation marker
Sun, X., & Kaufman, P. D. (2018) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-018-0659-8 · Cited by 963
MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint
Stewart, G. S., Wang, B., Bignell, C. R., Taylor, A. M. R., & Elledge, S. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01446 · Cited by 874
MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint
Goldberg, M., Stucki, M., Falck, J., D'Amours, D., Rahman, D., Pappin, D., Bartek, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01445 · Cited by 506
Self-citationBacterial Growth and Cell Division: a Mycobacterial Perspective
Hett, E. C., & Rubin, E. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00028-07 · Cited by 408
Defective DNA Repair and Neurodegenerative Disease
Rass, U., Ahel, I., & West, S. C. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.043 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Durocher, D., & Jackson, S. P.
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-20
- Volume
- 513
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-66
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2034195376
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
