Observation of human corneal and scleral collagen fibrils by atomic force microscopy
Abstract
Purpose We attempted to analyze the three-dimensional ultrastructure of human corneal and scleral collagen fibrils with an atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods A normal eye removed from a 66-year-old male patient during therapy was used in this study. Suspended corneal and scleral collagen fibrils were individually attached to glass slides by centrifugation. These collagen fibrils were air-dried and observed with a noncontact-mode AFM in air. Results AFM imaging provided information on the surface topography of both corneal and scleral collagen fibrils. The corneal collagen fibrils had a height of 11.9 +/- 1.0 nm (mean +/- SD) and scleral fibrils a height of 82.5 +/- 35.6 nm. A periodic banding pattern of grooves and ridges was clearly found on both types of fibrils; the D-periodicity and the groove depth were 65.7 +/- 0.8 nm and 1.46 +/- 0.50 nm in the corneal fibrils, and 67.3 +/- 1.1 nm and 6.16 +/- 1.23 nm in the scleral fibrils. Conclusions Surface topographic images of human corneal and scleral collagen fibrils were clearly obtained with the AFM. This technique provides quantitative information on the surface morphology of the collagen fibrils at high resolution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When proteoglycans have their attached glycosaminoglycans removed enzymatically, the surface gap depth increases to about 1.5 nm.
“When proteoglycans have their attached glycosaminoglycans removed enzymatically, the surface gap depth increases to about 1.5 nm (Yamamoto et al., 2002).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Yamamoto et al., 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
The applications of atomic force microscopy to vision science
Last, J. A., Russell, P., Nealey, P. F., & Murphy, C. J. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5470 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Keeping an Eye on Decellularized Corneas: A Review of Methods, Characterization and Applications
Wilson, S., Sidney, L., Dunphy, S., Rose, J., & Hopkinson, A. (2013) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb4030114 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yamamoto, S.
- Affiliations
- Niigata University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamamoto, S
- Venue
- Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 496-501
- ISSN
- 0021-5155 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248439437
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
- Keywords
- corneal collagen fibrils, collagen fibril ultrastructure, surface topography, non-contact atomic force microscopy, human cornea, human sclera
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review