The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulation of receptor concentration by homologous hormone. Effect of human growth hormone on its receptor in IM-9 lymphocytes.
Open accessAbstract
When cultured human lymphocytes of the IM-9 line were exposed to human growth hormone (hGH) at 37 degrees, washed for 2 hours, and incubated with 125I-hGH, the binding of 125I-hGH was reduced. The magnitude of the reduction in binding was dependent on the concentration of growth hormone present as well as the duration of the exposure. As little as 2 X 10(-11) M (0.5 ng/ml) growth hormone had a discernible effect. Growth hormone at 2 X 10(-10) M (5.0 ng/ml), which is a low resting concentration of hormone in vivo and occupies about 20% of the receptors at steady state at 30 degrees, produced a 50% reduction in binding while 20 mg/ml, which occupies about 50% of the receptors under steady state conditions, produced an 80% loss of receptors. Further increases in growth hormone concentration produced little further effect on receptor loss. Thus, the loss of receptors at a given concentration of growth hormone (up to 20 ng/ml) in the preincubation at 37 degrees was greater than the occupancy produced by that concentration of growth hormone receptors under steady state conditions at 30 degrees. Analysis of the data indicated that the decrease in binding of 125I-hGH was due to a loss of receptors per cell without any change in affinity of receptor for hormone or in cell number. The concentration of insulin receptors on these cells was affected by the insulin concentration in the medium, and the concentration of growth hormone receptors was affected by growth hormone, but neither hormone had any effect on the heterologous receptors. Exposure of the cells to cycloheximide (0.1 mM) produced a progressive but smaller loss of growth hormone receptors, and the effect of cycloheximide was additive to the receptor loss induced by growth hormone, suggesting that cycloheximide inhibited synthesis of receptors while growth hormone accelerated loss of receptors. When growth hormone was removed from the medium, receptor concentrations were restored rapidly; half of the loss was restored by 6 to 8 hours and the full complement of receptors was restored by 24 hours following removal of the hormone. If the growth hormone was removed and replaced with cycloheximide, the return of the receptors was delayed until the cycloheximide was removed. Thus restoration of the receptors appeared to require the synthesis of new proteins. These data indicate that in the IM-9 lymphocytes the concentration of growth hormone receptors is very sensitive to regulation by growth hormone and also add further support to the suggestion that hormones in general actively regulate the concentration of their own receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Kahn, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 244, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)44468-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Kahn, 1972, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 48, 135, 10.1016/0006-291X(72)90354-3 · DOI
- Soll, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 4127, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42492-7 · DOI
- Soll, 1975, J. Biol. Chem., 250, 4702, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)41358-6 · DOI
- Soll, 1975, J. Clin. Invest., 56, 769, 10.1172/JCI108155 · DOI · Paper page
- Archer, 1975, J. Clin. Invest., 55, 166, 10.1172/JCI107907 · DOI · Paper page
- Gavin, 1974, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 71, 84, 10.1073/pnas.71.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
- Lesniak, 1973, Nature New Biol., 241, 20, 10.1038/newbio241020a0 · doi:10.1038/newbio241020a0
- Lesniak, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 1661, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42840-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Fahey, 1971, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 190, 221, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13537.x · DOI
- Moore, 1966, Cancer, 19, 713, 10.1002/1097-0142(196605)19:5<713::AID-CNCR2820190518>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Roth, 1975, Methods Enzymol., 37, 223, 10.1016/S0076-6879(75)37018-3 · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(75)37018-3
- Scatchard, 1949, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 51, 660, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1949.tb27297.x · DOI · Paper page
- Lesniak, 1974, Clin. Res., 22, 343A
- Archer, 1973, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 36, 627, 10.1210/jcem-36-4-627 · DOI
- Goldfine, 1973, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 53, 853, 10.1016/0006-291X(73)90171-X · DOI
- Ducharme, 1961, J. Clin. Invest., 40, 243, 10.1172/JCI104250 · doi:10.1172/jci104250
- Bar, 1976, Clin. Res., 24, 269A
- Hinkle, 1976, Biochemistry, 14, 3845, 10.1021/bi00688a017 · DOI · Paper page
- Posner, 1975, Science, 188, 57, 10.1126/science.163493 · doi:10.1126/science.163493
- Costlow, 1975, Endocrinology, 96, 79
- Richards, 1976, The Biology of Reproduction
- Mukherjee, 1975, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 72, 1945, 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1945 · DOI · Paper page
- Kebabian, 1975, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 72, 3735, 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3735 · DOI · Paper page
- Milgrom, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 6366, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43455-8 · DOI
- Cidlowski, 1974, Endocrinology, 95, 1629, 10.1210/endo-95-6-1621 · doi:10.1210/endo-95-6-1621
- Mester, 1975, Biochem. J., 146, 617, 10.1042/bj1460617 · DOI
- De Meyts, 1976, J. Supramol. Struct., 4, 241, 10.1002/jss.400040211 · doi:10.1002/jss.400040211
- Frazier, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 5513, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)79758-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Limbird, 1975, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 64, 1160, 10.1016/0006-291X(75)90815-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Ranke, 1974, Endocrinology, 94, A-73
- Funder, 1976, Recent Progress in Hormone Research, Proceedings of the 1974 Laurentian Hormone Conference, 31, 129
- Olefsky, 1975, Metabolism, 24, 517, 10.1016/0026-0495(75)90076-1 · DOI
- Zeleznik, 1974, Endocrinology, 95, 818, 10.1210/endo-95-3-818 · DOI · Paper page
- Sherman, 1975, Clin. Res., 23, 479A
- Sraer, 1974, Endocrinology, 95, 632, 10.1210/endo-95-2-632 · DOI
- Chevillott, 1976, Clin. Sci. Mol. Med.
- Soloff, 1975, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 65, 205, 10.1016/S0006-291X(75)80080-5 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Belchetz, P. E., Plant, T. M., Nakai, Y., Keogh, E. J., & Knobil, E. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.100883 · Cited by 1,385
Effect of Growth Hormone on Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism
DAVIDSON, M. B. (1987) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-8-2-115 · Cited by 573
Insulin signaling in health and disease
Saltiel, A. R. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci142241 · Cited by 446
The Effect of Growth Hormone on Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Secretion in Man*
BRATUSCH-MARRAIN, P. R., SMITH, D., & DEFRONZO, R. A. (1982) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-55-5-973 · Cited by 321
Thyroxine and propylthiouracil effects in vivo on alpha and beta adrenergic receptors in rat heart
Ciaraldi, T., & Marinetti, G. V. (1977) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/0006-291x(77)91615-1 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesniak, M. A., & Roth, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-06
- Volume
- 251
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3720-3729
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W141312638
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 16219 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of receptor concentration by homologous hormone. Effect of human growth hormone on its receptor in IM-9 lymphocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)33403-8
- The paper
- Lesniak, M. A., & Roth, J. (1976). Regulation of receptor concentration by homologous hormone. Effect of human growth hormone on its receptor in IM-9 lymphocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)33403-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.