Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Different fate in vivo of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein and acetylated low density lipoprotein in rats. Recognition by various scavenger receptors on Kupffer and endothelial liver cells

Open access
Van Berkel, T J, De Rijke, Y B, Kruijt, J K·1991·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Human low density lipoprotein was oxidized (Ox-LDL) by exposure to 5 microM Cu2+ and its fate in vivo was compared to acetylated low density lipoprotein (Ac-LDL). Ox-LDL, when injected into rats, is rapidly removed from the blood circulation by the liver, similarly as Ac-LDL. A separation of rat liver cells into parenchymal, endothelial, and Kupffer cells at 10 min after injection of Ox-LDL or Ac-LDL indicated that the Kupffer cell uptake of Ox-LDL is 6.8-fold higher than for Ac-LDL, leading to Kupffer cells as the main liver site for Ox-LDL uptake. In vitro studies with isolated liver cells indicated that saturable high affinity sites for Ox-LDL were present on both endothelial and Kupffer cells, whereby the capacity of Kupffer cells to degrade Ox-LDL is 6-fold higher than for endothelial cells. Competition studies showed that unlabeled Ox-LDL competed as efficiently (90%) as unlabeled Ac-LDL with the cell association and degradation of 125I-labeled Ac-LDL by endothelial and Kupffer cells. However, unlabeled Ac-LDL competed only partially (20-30%) with the cell association and degradation of 125I-labeled Ox-LDL by Kupffer cells, while unlabeled Ox-LDL or polyinosinic acid competed for 70-80%. It is concluded that the liver contains, in addition to the scavenger (Ac-LDL) receptor which interacts efficiently with both Ac-LDL and Ox-LDL and which is concentrated on endothelial cells, an additional specific Ox-LDL receptor which is highly concentrated on Kupffer cells. In vivo the specific Ox-LDL recognition site on Kupffer cells will form the major protection system against the occurrence of the atherogenic Ox-LDL particles in the blood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)52241-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Van Berkel, T. J., De Rijke, Y. B., & Kruijt, J. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-02
Volume
266
Issue
4
Pages
2282-2289
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524139871
Cited by
278
References
29
FWCI
20.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different fate in vivo of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein and acetylated low density lipoprotein in rats. Recognition by various scavenger receptors on Kupffer and endothelial liver cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)52241-9
The paper
Van Berkel, T. J., De Rijke, Y. B., & Kruijt, J. K. (1991). Different fate in vivo of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein and acetylated low density lipoprotein in rats. Recognition by various scavenger receptors on Kupffer and endothelial liver cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)52241-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.