Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The low density lipoprotein receptor. Identification of amino acids in cytoplasmic domain required for rapid endocytosis.

Davis, C.G., van Driel, I.R., Russell, D.W., Brown, M.S., Goldstein, J.L.·1987·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The 50-residue cytoplasmic domain of the low density lipoprotein receptor (amino acids 790-839) directs the receptor to coated pits, thereby facilitating rapid endocytosis of bound low density lipoprotein. To determine the structural features required for this targeting, we produced 24 mutations in the cytoplasmic domain through use of oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. The first 22 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain (residues 790-811) are sufficient for rapid internalization. The amino acid at position 807 is especially critical. Aromatic residues (tyrosine, phenylalanine, or tryptophan) at this position allow rapid internalization. Charged or uncharged aliphatic residues do not substitute. Although the requirements at the neighboring positions (806 and 808) are less stringent, the insertion of proline at position 806 is detrimental. These specificities suggest that the juxtamembranous region of the cytoplasmic domain participates in protein:protein interactions that allow the low density lipoprotein receptor to cluster in coated pits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)61313-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Goldstein, 1985, Annu. Rev. Cell Biol., 1, 1, 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown, 1976, Cell, 9, 663, 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90130-6 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 1977, Nature, 270, 695, 10.1038/270695a0 · DOI
  4. Lehrman, 1985, Cell, 41, 735, 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80054-4 · DOI
  5. Davis, 1986, Cell, 45, 15, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90533-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kingsley, 1984, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81, 5454, 10.1073/pnas.81.17.5454 · DOI
  7. Roth, 1986, J. Cell Biol., 102, 1271, 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1271 · DOI
  8. Matlin, 1983, J. Cell Biol., 97, 627, 10.1083/jcb.97.3.627 · DOI
  9. Rizzolo, 1985, J. Cell Biol., 101, 1351, 10.1083/jcb.101.4.1351 · DOI
  10. Prywes, 1986, EMBO J., 5, 2179, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04482.x · DOI
  11. Goldstein, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 98, 241, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  12. Southern, 1982, J. Mol. Appl. Genet., 1, 327
  13. Caruthers, 1982, Vol. 4, 1
  14. Yamamoto, 1984, Cell, 39, 27, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zoller, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 100, 468, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)00074-9 · DOI
  16. Zoller, 1984, DNA (N. Y.), 3, 479
  17. Messing, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 101, 20, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01005-8 · DOI
  18. Myers, 1985, Science, 229, 242, 10.1126/science.2990046 · DOI
  19. Sanger, 1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 74, 5463, 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Wigler, 1979, Cell, 16, 777, 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90093-X · DOI
  21. Krieger, 1979, J. Supramol. Struct., 10, 467, 10.1002/jss.400100409 · DOI
  22. Tolleshaug, 1983, Cell, 32, 941, 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90079-X · DOI
  23. Zuniga, 1986, J. Cell Biol., 102, 1, 10.1083/jcb.102.1.1 · DOI
  24. Goldstein, 1976, Cell, 7, 85, 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90258-0 · DOI
  25. Goldstein, 1977, Cell, 12, 629, 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90263-X · DOI
  26. Kishimoto, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 1344, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)75792-5 · DOI
  27. Ullrich, 1985, Nature, 313, 756, 10.1038/313756a0 · DOI
  28. Ebina, 1985, Cell, 40, 747, 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90334-4 · DOI
  29. Mostov, 1984, Nature, 308, 37, 10.1038/308037a0 · DOI
  30. Rose, 1984, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81, 2050, 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2050 · DOI
  31. Ullrich, 1984, Nature, 309, 418, 10.1038/309418a0 · DOI
  32. McClelland, 1984, Cell, 39, 267, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90004-7 · DOI
  33. Drickamer, 1984, J. Biol. Chem., 259, 770, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)43524-1 · DOI
  34. Russell, 1984, Cell, 37, 577, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90388-X · DOI · Paper page
  35. Yamamoto, 1986, Science, 232, 1230, 10.1126/science.3010466 · DOI
  36. Meggio, 1984, J. Biol. Chem., 259, 14576, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42640-8 · DOI
  37. Basu, 1981, Cell, 24, 493, 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90340-8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davis, C. G., van Driel, I. R., Russell, D. W., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-03
Volume
262
Issue
9
Pages
4075-4082
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
238
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review