Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two Different Cell Types have Different Major Receptors for Human Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNFα)

Open access
Hohmann, H P, Remy, R, Brockhaus, M, van Loon, A P·1989·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The receptors for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) were analyzed on myeloid cells (HL60, U937, K562, and freshly isolated blood monocytes) and on cells of epithelial origin (MCF7, HEp2 and HeLa cells), by use of radiolabeled TNF alpha and cross-linking experiments. Both cell types had high but slightly different affinities for TNF alpha. The myeloid cells had major cross-linked products of 98-100 kDa, which were similar in their N-linked glycosylation, whereas the cells of epithelial origin contained a major cross-linked product of 75 kDa, a second product of 95 kDa. The major receptors of both cell types (studied mostly with HL60 and HEp2 cells) are different proteins because (a) their apparent molecular masses were different and no evidence was obtained for cell-specific proteases, which could generate the differently sized receptors from one common receptor molecule; (b) anti-receptor antibodies, which precipitated the 95- and 75-kDa products, did not precipitate the 100-kDa cross-linked complex; (c) the native TNF alpha-receptor complexes had different proteolytic fingerprints; (d) the tryptic fragments differed in their association with the cell membrane vesicles; (e) the receptors differed in their degree of N-linked glycosylation; and (f) O-linked glycosylation was found on the major receptor of HL60 but not of HEp2 cells. In addition, myeloid cells may also contain a small amount of the HEp2-type of TNF alpha receptor. We suggest that at least two different receptors for TNF alpha exist.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63791-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Hohmann, H. P., Remy, R., Brockhaus, M., & van Loon, A. P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-09
Volume
264
Issue
25
Pages
14927-14934
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552669957
Cited by
356
References
27
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Different Cell Types have Different Major Receptors for Human Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNFα). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63791-3
The paper
Hohmann, H. P., Remy, R., Brockhaus, M., & van Loon, A. P. (1989). Two Different Cell Types have Different Major Receptors for Human Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNFα). Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63791-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.