Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification of nucleotides responsible for enhancer activity of sterol regulatory element in low density lipoprotein receptor gene.

Smith, J R, Osborne, T F, Goldstein, J L, Brown, M S·1990·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Sterol-dependent regulation of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor promoter has been localized previously to a 16-base pair sequence, designated repeat 2, in the 5'-flanking region of the gene. In the current study, we show that the central 10 nucleotides of repeat 2 are crucial for the sterol regulatory activity. This sequence includes an octamer, designated sterol regulatory element 1 (SRE-1), which was identified previously in the promoter of the gene for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase, a sterol-regulated enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis. We made a series of single-base substitutions within a 1471-base pair fragment of the intact LDL receptor promoter, introduced the mutant plasmids into hamster cells by transfection, and measured mRNA levels in the absence and presence of sterols. Substitutions within the 10-base pair sequence in repeat 2 largely prevented the induction of transcription which occurs in the absence of sterols. None of these point mutations affected transcription in the presence of sterols. Like an enhancer, the SRE-1 in repeat 2 functioned in an orientation-independent manner. We interpret these findings to indicate that the SRE-1 of the LDL receptor promoter is a conditional positive element that cooperates with other elements to enhance transcription in the absence of sterols and loses its function in the presence of sterols.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)39976-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Smith, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 18480, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)81383-2 · DOI
  2. Osborne, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 3380, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69082-9 · DOI
  3. Südhof, 1987, Cell, 48, 1061, 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90713-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dawson, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 3372, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69081-7 · DOI
  5. Goldstein, 1984, J. Lipid Res., 25, 1450, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34418-7 · DOI
  6. Metherall, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 15634, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84879-2 · DOI
  7. Südhof, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 10773, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)61030-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gil, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 19009, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37382-4 · DOI
  9. Gil, 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 85, 8963, 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8963 · DOI
  10. Goldstein, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 98, 241, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  11. Southern, 1982, J. Mol. Appl. Gen., 1, 327
  12. Gorman, 1982, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2, 1044
  13. McKnight, 1982, Science, 217, 316, 10.1126/science.6283634 · DOI
  14. Zoller, 1984, DNA (NY), 3, 479, 10.1089/dna.1.1984.3.479 · DOI
  15. Gil, 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 84, 1863, 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1863 · DOI
  16. Alton, 1979, Nature, 282, 864, 10.1038/282864a0 · DOI
  17. Rajavashisth, 1989, Science, 254, 640, 10.1126/science.2562787 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. R., Osborne, T. F., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-02
Volume
265
Issue
4
Pages
2306-2310
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
188
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review