Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel mechanism for controlling the activity of alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. Multiple regulatory sites for 39-kDa receptor-associated protein.

Williams, S.E., Ashcom, J.D., Argraves, W.S., Strickland, D.K.·1992·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (alpha 2MR/LRP) consists of two polypeptides, 515 and 85 kDa, that are noncovalently associated. A 39-kDa polypeptide, termed the receptor-associated protein (RAP), interacts with the 515-kDa subunit after biosynthesis of these molecules and remains associated on the cell surface. This molecule regulates ligand binding of alpha 2MR/LRP (Herz, J., Goldstein, J. L., Strickland, D. K., Ho, Y. K., and Brown, M. S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21232-21238). Titration and binding studies indicate that RAP binds to two equivalent binding sites on alpha 2MR/LRP, with a KD of 14 nM. Heterologous ligand displacement experiments demonstrated that RAP completely inhibits the binding of 125I-activated alpha 2M to human fibroblasts and to the purified alpha 2MR/LRP, with a Ki of 23 and 26 nM, respectively. A direct correlation between the degree of binding of RAP to the receptor and the degree of ligand inhibition was observed, indicating that as the RAP binding sites are saturated, alpha 2MR/LRP loses its ability to bind ligands. Thus, the amount of RAP bound to alpha 2MR/LRP dictates the level of receptor activity. A model is proposed in which alpha 2MR/LRP contains multiple ligand binding sites, each regulated by a separate RAP site.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50384-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ashcom, 1990, J. Cell Biol., 110, 1041, 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1041 · DOI
  2. Jensen, 1989, FEBS Lett., 255, 275, 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81105-6 · DOI
  3. Moestrup, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 15574, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84870-6 · DOI
  4. Gliemann, 1986, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 855, 49, 10.1016/0167-4889(86)90037-6 · DOI
  5. Straight, 1988, Biochemistry, 27, 2885, 10.1021/bi00408a033 · DOI
  6. Van Leuven, 1979, J. Biol. Chem., 254, 5155, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)50573-1 · DOI
  7. Kaplan, 1979, J. Biol. Chem., 254, 7323, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)50322-7 · DOI
  8. Sottrup-Jensen, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 11539, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)80094-1 · DOI
  9. Maxfield, 1981, Biochemistry, 20, 5353, 10.1021/bi00521a041 · DOI
  10. Strickland, 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 17401, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)38172-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kristensen, 1990, FEBS Lett., 276, 151, 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80530-V · DOI
  12. Herz, 1988, EMBO J., 7, 4119, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03306.x · DOI
  13. Herz, 1990, EMBO J., 9, 1769, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08301.x · DOI
  14. Brown, 1991, Curr. Opinion Lipidol., 2, 65, 10.1097/00041433-199104000-00002 · DOI
  15. Beisiegel, 1989, Nature, 341, 162, 10.1038/341162a0 · DOI
  16. Kowal, 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 86, 5810, 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5810 · DOI
  17. Lund, 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 86, 9318, 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9318 · DOI
  18. Kowal, 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 10771, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)87014-4 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hussain, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 13936, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)92792-4 · DOI
  20. Beisiegel, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 88, 8342, 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8342 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Strickland, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 13364, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)98848-4 · DOI
  22. Furukawa, 1990, J. Biochem., 108, 297, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123197 · DOI
  23. Pietromonaco, 1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 87, 1811, 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1811 · DOI
  24. Moestrup, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 14011, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)92803-6 · DOI
  25. Herz, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 21232, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54845-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Barrett, 1981, Methods Enzymol., 80, 737, 10.1016/S0076-6879(81)80056-0 · DOI
  27. Porath, 1975, Nature, 258, 598, 10.1038/258598a0 · DOI
  28. Jones, 1972, Biochem. J., 127, 187, 10.1042/bj1270187 · DOI
  29. Hall, 1978, Biochem. J., 171, 27, 10.1042/bj1730027 · DOI
  30. Munson, 1980, Anal. Biochem., 107, 220, 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90515-1 · DOI
  31. Isaacs, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 6709, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68700-9 · DOI
  32. Busby, 1988, Biochemistry, 27, 6127, 10.1021/bi00416a045 · DOI
  33. Krause, 1974, Eur. J. Biochem., 41, 593, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03301.x · DOI
  34. Yamamoto, 1984, Cell, 39, 27, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Raychowdhury, 1989, Science, 244, 1163, 10.1126/science.2786251 · DOI
  36. Kanalas, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 10825, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99093-9 · DOI
  37. Kerjaschki, 1982, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 79, 5557, 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5557 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Williams, S. E., Ashcom, J. D., Argraves, W. S., & Strickland, D. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
267
Issue
13
Pages
9035-9040
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
285
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review