CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Pesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of pesticide residues in coconut water by liquid–liquid extraction and gas chromatography with electron-capture plus thermionic specific detection and solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

Brito, N.M., Navickiene, S., Polese, L., Jardim, E.F.G., Abakerli, R.B., Ribeiro, M.L.·2002·Journal of Chromatography A
DOI 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00351-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two simple methods were developed to determine 11 pesticides in coconut water, a natural isotonic drink rich in salts, sugars and vitamins consumed by the people and athletes. The first procedure involves solid-phase extraction using Sep-Pak Vac C18 disposable cartridges with methanol for elution. Isocratic analysis was carried out by means of high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection at 254 nm to analyse captan, chlorothalonil, carbendazim, lufenuron and diafenthiuron. The other procedure is based on liquid-liquid extraction with hexane-dichloromethane (1:1, v/v), followed by gas chromatographic analysis with effluent splitting to electron-capture detection for determination of endosulfan, captan, tetradifon and trichlorfon and thermionic specific detection for determination of malathion, parathion-methyl and monocrotophos. The methods were validated with fortified samples at different concentration levels (0.01-12.0 mg/kg). Average recoveries ranged from 75 to 104% with relative standard deviations between 1.4 and 11.5%. Each recovery analysis was repeated at least five times. Limits of detection ranged from 0.002 to 2.0 mg/kg. The analytical procedures were applied to 15 samples and no detectable amounts of the pesticides were found in any samples under the conditions described.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00351-5

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Leal, 1998, Fitopatologia, 33, 220
  2. Rao, 1985, Ind. Coconut J., 16, 7
  3. Anastassiades, 2001, Dtsch. Lebensm.-Rundsch., 97, 176
  4. 1987, Vol. 1, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brito, N. M., Navickiene, S., Polese, L., Jardim, E. F. G., Abakerli, R. B., & Ribeiro, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Embrapa (BR)
Corresponding author
Ribeiro, M.L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
957
Issue
2
Pages
201-209
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00351-5
OpenAlex
W1974982552
Cited by
147
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
pesticide residues, coconut water, solid-phase extraction, liquid-liquid extraction, electron capture detection, HPLC-UV, gas chromatography, captan, chlorothalonil, carbendazim, lufenuron, diafenthiuron, endosulfan, tetradifon, trichlorfon, malathion, methyl parathion, monocrotophos, food safety
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Gas, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Cocos, Pesticide Residues, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review