Cited by 96vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein Structure and Dynamics

The indistinguishability of epitopes from protein surface is explained by the distinct binding preferences of each of the six antigen-binding loops

Kunik, Vered, Ofran, Yanay·2013·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

General protein-protein interfaces are known to be enriched, compared with other surface patches, with amino acids that can form stabilizing interactions. However, several studies reported that there are hardly any differences between the amino acid composition of B-cell epitopes and that of antigen surface residues. If the amino acid composition of epitopes is indistinguishable from other surface patches, how do antibodies (Abs) identify epitopes? Here, we analyze the antigen binding regions (ABRs, roughly corresponding to the complementarity determining regions) and the epitopes in a non-redundant set of all known Ab-antigen complexes. We find that the ABRs differ significantly from each other in their amino acid composition and length. Analysis of the energetic contribution of each ABR to antigen binding reveals that, while H3 often plays a key role in antigen binding, in many antibodies other ABRs are more important. Moreover, each ABR has a distinct propensity to bind different amino acids on the antigen. The combined binding preferences of the ABRs yield a total preference to amino acids with a composition that is virtually identical to that of surface residues. These results suggest that antibodies evolved to recognize protein surfaces. They may help in improving Ab engineering and B-cell epitope prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzt027

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions, suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody.

    “However, arbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions [167–169] suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody [116, 118–120].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
599-609
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0134
  • 1741-0126
OpenAlex
W2132514101
Cited by
96
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
B-cell epitopes, antigen-binding region, hypervariable region, immune complexes, amino acid composition, epitope prediction, antibody engineering, protein-protein interfaces
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Antibody Specificity, Epitopes, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review