Cited by 123Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Effects of duloxetine, a new serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, on extracellular monoamine levels in rat frontal cortex.

Kihara, T, Ikeda, M·1995·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The effects of duloxetine (LY248686), a new inhibitor of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) uptake on extracellular levels of NE, 5-HT and dopamine (DA), were studied in the rat frontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, using in vivo microdialysis. The oral administration of duloxetine (3.125-12.5 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent increase in the output of both NE and 5-HT from the frontal cortex, this increase being maintained throughout the 4-hr observation period. Chronic administration of duloxetine (6.25 mg/kg, p.o.) for 14 days failed to alter basal NE and 5-HT levels in the frontal cortex, but augmented the duloxetine-induced increase in output of NE and 5-HT. Amitriptyline and maprotiline, administered p.o. at doses of 6.25 to 25 mg/kg, increased NE output, but the effect was weaker than that of duloxetine, and neither amitriptyline nor maprotiline changed 5-HT output from the frontal cortex. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and maprotiline brought about increases in DA levels in the rat frontal cortex, the increase in DA levels induced by duloxetine being approximately two or three times more potent than that induced by amitriptyline and maprotiline. In the nucleus accumbens, duloxetine also produced a dose-dependent increase in DA output more potent than that produced by amitriptyline and maprotiline. These results show that duloxetine causes a potent and sustained increase in the output of both NE and 5-HT in the rat frontal cortex, related to its inhibition of NE and 5-HT uptake; these results also show that duloxetine increases DA output in the frontal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)24303-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kihara, T., & Ikeda, M.
Affiliations
Shionogi (Japan) (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
272
Issue
1
Pages
177-183
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1846318813
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
duloxetine, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, amitriptyline, maprotiline, chronic drug administration, antidepressant effects
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Amitriptyline, Animals, Biological Transport, Cerebral Cortex, Dopamine, Male, Maprotiline, Norepinephrine, Nucleus Accumbens, Serotonin, Thiophenes, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review