The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey.
Abstract
A choice procedure was developed to compare the reinforcing efficacy of drug solutions delivered via intravenous catheters to rhesus monkeys. Choices were arranged between doses of cocaine or methylphenidate and saline, different doses of the same drug and doses of both drugs. In each session, monkeys were allowed to self-inject one solution five times in the presence of a stimulus. Thirty minutes after the fifth injection, a second solution could be self-injected five times in the presence of a different stimulus. Thirty minutes later, choice trials began in which both stimuli were present and monkeys could choose one of the two solutions. Rate of responding decreased with increases in dose for both cocaine (0.05-1.5 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (0.075-0.7 mg/kg). Response rates maintained by cocaine were 2 to 3 times higher than those maintained by methylphenidate. Drug was always chosen over saline. Higher doses of cocaine were preferred to lower doses except when both were above 0.5 mg/kg, when no preference was shown. Higher doses of methylphenidate were preferred over low doses, but compared to cocaine, a greater absolute difference between dose magnitude was required to demonstrate preference. When equal doses of cocaine and methylphenidate were compared, no preference was shown. On other comparisons between the drugs, the higher dose was generally preferred regardless of the drug. The reinforcing efficacy of drugs must be considered not only in terms of response rate maintained or reinforcement schedule but also with reference to concurrently available drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cocaine Receptors on Dopamine Transporters Are Related to Self-Administration of Cocaine
Ritz, M. C., Lamb, R. J., Goldberg, S. R., & Kuhar, M. J. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2820058 · Cited by 2,180
Richardson, N. R., & Roberts, D. C. S. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(95)00153-0 · Cited by 1,358
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Fowler, J. S., Gatley, S. J., Logan, J., Ding, Y.-S., Hitzemann, R., & Pappas, N. (1998) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.155.10.1325 · Cited by 885
Volkow, N. D. (1995) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950180042006 · Cited by 575
Markou, A., Weiss, F., Gold, L. H., Caine, S. B., Schulteis, G., & Koob, G. F. (1993) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244907 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Johanson, C. E., & Schuster, C. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-05
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 676-688
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141678890
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30186-2
- The paper
- Johanson, C. E., & Schuster, C. R. (1975). A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30186-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.