The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PERCUTANEOUS AFFERENT NEUROMODULATION FOR THE REFRACTORY OVERACTIVE BLADDER: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY
Abstract
PURPOSE: More than 20 million Americans have an overactive bladder, the predominant symptoms being frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and pelvic pain. While the etiology is not completely understood, most investigators believe the causes to be many and the pelvic floor to be intimately related. Whatever the etiology, traditional therapies, including dietary manipulation, bladder drill, medications and physical therapy, are often poorly tolerated and/or ineffective. We report a prospective, multicenter clinical trial that was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous peripheral afferent nerve stimulation for treatment of refractive overactive bladder and/or pelvic floor dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients with overactive bladders, in whom all traditional therapy failed, were enrolled in 1 of 5 sites within the United States. Patients received weekly percutaneous electrical stimulations via a 34 gauge needle placed near the tibial nerve 3 finger breadths above the ankle. Urodynamic studies, detailed voiding diaries, quality of life surveys, and incontinence impact questionnaires were completed before, during and after the study. RESULTS: Of the patients with a mean age of 57.4 years 89% (47 of 53) completed the 12-week study. A total of 71% of patients were classified as treatment successes by the investigators and were started on long-term treatment. On average patients noticed a 25% reduction in mean daytime and 21% reduction in mean nighttime voiding frequencies (p <0.05). Urge incontinence was reduced by an average of 35% (p <0.05). Statistically significant improvements were noted in selective pain and quality of life indexes. No significant adverse events related to treatment were noted in any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous peripheral afferent nerve stimulation offers a safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment for managing refractive overactive bladder and/or pelvic floor dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Fall, 1991, Electrical stimulation: a physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence, Urol Clin North Am, 18, 393, 10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01005-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Boyce, 1964, Research related to the development of an artificial electrical stimulator for the paralyzed human bladder, J Urol, 91, 41, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64053-9 · DOI
- Bradley, 1971, A decade of experience with electronic stimulation of the micturition reflex, Urol Int, 26, 283, 10.1159/000279737 · DOI
- Habib, 1967, Experience and recent contributions in sacral nerve stimulation for voiding in both human and animal, Br J Urol, 39, 73, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1967.tb11787.x · DOI
- Heine, 1977, Intraspinal sacral root stimulation for controlled micturition, Invest Urol, 15, 78
- Tanagho, 1988, Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder, J Urol, 140, 1331, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42038-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt, 1999, Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence, J Urol, 162, 352, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68558-8 · DOI · Paper page
- McGuire, 1983, Treatment of motor and sensory detrusor instability by electrical stimulation, J Urol, 129, 78, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)51928-X · DOI · Paper page
- Stoller, 1987, The efficacy of acupuncture in reversing the unstable bladder in pig-tailed monkeys, J Urol, 137, 104A
- de Groat, 1997, A neurologic basis for the overactive bladder, Urology, 50, 36, 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00587-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Appell, 1997, Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder: a pooled analysis, Urology, 50, 90, 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00599-2 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bo, K., Frawley, H. C., Haylen, B. T., Abramov, Y., Almeida, F. G., Berghmans, B., Bortolini, M., Dumoulin, C., Gomes, M., McClurg, D., et al. (2017) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4 · Cited by 429
THE USE OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF BLADDER DYSFUNCTION: A REVIEW OF METHODS
van BALKEN, M. R., VERGUNST, H., & BEMELMANS, B. L. H. (2004) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000134418.21959.98 · Cited by 121
Control of urinary bladder function with devices: successes and failures
Gaunt, R. A., & Prochazka, A. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)52011-9 · Cited by 105
Al-Danakh, A., Safi, M., Alradhi, M., Almoiliqy, M., Chen, Q., Al-Nusaif, M., Yang, X., Al-Dherasi, A., Zhu, X., & Yang, D. (2022) · Parkinson's Disease · doi:10.1155/2022/2700227 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- GOVIER, F. E., LITWILLER, S., NITTI, V., KREDER, K. J., & ROSENBLATT, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1193-1198
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2137396285
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
