The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging
Abstract
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jan 1974Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging Donald F. Gleason, George T. Mellinger, and The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group Donald F. GleasonDonald F. Gleason , George T. MellingerGeorge T. Mellinger , and The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1974 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByIto Y, Udo K, Vertosick E, Sjoberg D, Vickers A, Al-Ahmadie H, Chen Y, Gopalan A, Sirintrapun S, Tickoo S, Scardino P, Eastham J, Reuter V and Fine S (2019) Clinical Usefulness of Prostate and Tumor Volume Related Parameters following Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 3, (535-540), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019.Rosenbaum C, Mandel P, Tennstedt P, Boehm K, Chun F, Graefen M, Heinzer H, Tilki D and Salomon G (2018) The Impact of Repeat Prostate Biopsies on Oncologic, Pathological and Perioperative Outcomes after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 1, (103-108), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.Hansel D (2016) The Gleason Grading System: The Approach that Changed Prostate Cancer AssessmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 2S, (S140-S141), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017.Truong M, Hollenberg G, Weinberg E, Messing E, Miyamoto H and Frye T (2018) Impact of Gleason Subtype on Prostate Cancer Detection Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Final HistopathologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 2, (316-321), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.Stroup S, Moreira D, Chen Z, Howard L, Berger J, Terris M, Aronson W, Cooperberg M, Amling C, Kane C and Freedland S (2018) Biopsy Detected Gleason Pattern 5 is Associated with Recurrence, Metastasis and Mortality in a Cohort of Men with High Risk Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 6, (1309-1315), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.Newcomb L, Thompson I, Boyer H, Brooks J, Carroll P, Cooperberg M, Dash A, Ellis W, Fazli L, Feng Z, Gleave M, Kunju P, Lance R, McKenney J, Meng M, Nicolas M, Sanda M, Simko J, So A, Tretiakova M, Troyer D, True L, Vakar-Lopez F, Virgin J, Wagner A, Wei J, Zheng Y, Nelson P and Lin D (2018) Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS CohortJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 2, (313-320), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.Mandel P, Kriegmair M, Kamphake J, Chun F, Graefen M, Huland H and Tilki D (2018) Tumor Characteristics and Oncologic Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy in Men 75 Years Old or OlderJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (89-94), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.Boehm K, Larcher A, Tian Z, Mandel P, Schiffmann J, Karakiewicz P, Graefen M, Huland H and Tilki D (2018) Low Other Cause Mortality Rates Reflect Good Patient Selection in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (82-88), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M and Budaeus L (2018) Shear Wave Elastography for Localization of Prostate Cancer Lesions and Assessment of Elasticity Thresholds: Implications for Targeted Biopsies and Active Surveillance ProtocolsJournal of Urology, VOL. 193, NO. 3, (794-800), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.Eggener S, Badani K, Barocas D, Barrisford G, Cheng J, Chin A, Corcoran A, Epstein J, George A, Gupta G, Hayn M, Kauffman E, Lane B, Liss M, Mirza M, Morgan T, Moses K, Nepple K, Preston M, Rais-Bahrami S, Resnick M, Siddiqui M, Silberstein J, Singer E, Sonn G, Sprenkle P, Stratton K, Taylor J, Tomaszewski J, Tollefson M, Vickers A, White W and Lowrance W (2018) Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population HealthJournal of Urology, VOL. 194, NO. 3, (626-634), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.Adam M, Hannah A, Budäus L, Steuber T, Salomon G, Michl U, Haese A, Fisch M, Wittmer C, Steurer S, Minner S, Heinzer H, Huland H, Graefen M, Sauter G, Schlomm T and Isbarn H (2018) A Tertiary Gleason Pattern in the Prostatectomy Specimen and its Association with Adverse Outcome after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 1, (97-102), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014.Maldonado L, Brait M, Loyo M, Sullenberger L, Wang K, Peskoe S, Rosenbaum E, Howard R, Toubaji A, Albadine R, Netto G, Hoque M, Platz E and Sidransky D (2018) GSTP1 Promoter Methylation is Associated with Recurrence in Early Stage Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 5, (1542-1548), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014.Masterson T, Cheng L, Mehan R and Koch M (2018) Tumor Focality Does Not Predict Biochemical Recurrence After
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook, W. C., Amin, M. B., & Egevad, L. L. (2005) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1 · Cited by 2,763
Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Hricak, H., Choyke, P. L., Eberhardt, S. C., Leibel, S. A., & Scardino, P. T. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2431030580 · Cited by 601
Pathobiology of autochthonous prostate cancer in a pre‐clinical transgenic mouse model
Kaplan‐Lefko, P. J., Chen, T., Ittmann, M. M., Barrios, R. J., Ayala, G. E., Huss, W. J., Maddison, L. A., Foster, B. A., & Greenberg, N. M. (2003) · The Prostate · doi:10.1002/pros.10215 · Cited by 438
Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?
Stark, J. R., Perner, S., Stampfer, M. J., Sinnott, J. A., Finn, S., Eisenstein, A. S., Ma, J., Fiorentino, M., Kurth, T., Loda, M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.4669 · Cited by 389
Chen, P.-H. C., Gadepalli, K., MacDonald, R., Liu, Y., Kadowaki, S., Nagpal, K., Kohlberger, T., Dean, J., Corrado, G. S., Hipp, J. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0539-7 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleason, D. F., Mellinger, G. T., & The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group Members of this group areS0022534717598894-57c401330b4195dbd1713587ed540477 Lino J. Arduino Veterans Administration Center (VAC), D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-64
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2006115709
- Cited by
- 2,214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59889-4
- The paper
- Gleason, D. F., Mellinger, G. T., & The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group Members of this group areS0022534717598894-57c401330b4195dbd1713587ed540477 Lino J. Arduino Veterans Administration Center (VAC), D. M. (1974). Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59889-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
