The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
Abstract
Epstein, Jonathan I MD; Allsbrook, William C Jr MD; Amin, Mahul B MD; Egevad, Lars L MD, PhD and the ISUP Grading Committee Author Information
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gleason, D. F., Mellinger, G. T., & The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group Members of this group areS0022534717598894-57c401330b4195dbd1713587ed540477 Lino J. Arduino Veterans Administration Center (VAC), D. M. (1974) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59889-4 · Cited by 2,214
Partin, A. W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.18.1445 · Cited by 1,794
Random Systematic Versus Directed Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Prostate
Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., Terris, M. K., & Stamey, T. A. (1989) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38664-0 · Cited by 1,571
Classification of prostatic carcinomas.
Gleason, D. F. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 1,110
van Leenders, G. J. L. H., van der Kwast, T. H., Grignon, D. J., Evans, A. J., Kristiansen, G., Kweldam, C. F., Litjens, G., McKenney, J. K., Melamed, J., Mottet, N., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001497 · Cited by 713
Steinberg, D. M., Sauvageot, J., Piantadosi, S., & Epstein, J. I. (1997) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199705000-00010 · Cited by 360
Self-citationEpstein, J. I., Amin, M. B., Fine, S. W., Algaba, F., Aron, M., Baydar, D. E., Beltran, A. L., Brimo, F., Cheville, J. C., Colecchia, M., et al. (2021) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2020-0015-ra · Cited by 280
Self-citationPoulos, C. K., Daggy, J., & Cheng, L. (2004) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800302 · Cited by 69
Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists
Egevad, L., Allsbrook, W. C., & Epstein, J. I. (2004) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2004.10.001 · Cited by 55
Self-citationPredicting clinical end points: treatment nomograms in prostate cancer
DiBlasio, C. (2003) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0093-7754(03)00351-8 · Cited by 34
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Amin, 1994, Analysis of cribriform morphology in prostatic neoplasia using antibody to high molecular-weight cytokeratin., Arch Pathol Lab Med, 118, 260
- Amin, 2005, Egevad, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens., Scand J Urol Nephrol, 39, 20, 10.1080/03008880510030923 · doi:10.1080/03008880510030923
- Bailar, 1966, 3rd, Mellinger GT, Gleason DF. Survival rates of patients with prostatic cancer, tumor stage, and differentiation: preliminary report., Cancer Chemother Rep, 50, 129
- Baisden, 1999, Perineural invasion, mucinous fibroplasia, and glomerulations: diagnostic features of limited cancer on prostate needle biopsy., Am J Surg Pathol, 23, 918, 10.1097/00000478-199908000-00009 · doi:10.1097/00000478-199908000-00009
- Bostwick, 1995, Collagenous micronodules in prostate cancer: a specific but infrequent diagnostic finding., Arch Pathol Lab Med, 119, 444
- Brinker, 1999, Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed on needle biopsy: correlation with clinical and radical prostatectomy findings and progression., Am J Surg Pathol, 23, 1471, 10.1097/00000478-199912000-00004 · doi:10.1097/00000478-199912000-00004
- Cohen, 1994, Sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: how much is adequate?, Am J Clin Pathol, 101, 250, 10.1093/ajcp/101.3.250 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/101.3.250
- Epstein, 1985, Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland., Am J Surg Pathol, 9, 299, 10.1097/00000478-198504000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00000478-198504000-00006
- Epstein, 2000, Gleason score 2-4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: a diagnosis that should not be made., Am J Surg Pathol, 24, 477, 10.1097/00000478-200004000-00001 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200004000-00001
- Epstein, 2005, Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens., Scand J Urol Nephrol, 39, 34, 10.1080/03008880510030932 · doi:10.1080/03008880510030932
- Hall, 1992, Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens: a comparative analysis of sampling methods., Am J Surg Pathol, 16, 315, 10.1097/00000478-199204000-00001 · doi:10.1097/00000478-199204000-00001
- Humphrey, 1998, Pseudohyperplastic prostatic adenocarcinoma., Am J Surg Pathol, 22, 1239, 10.1097/00000478-199810000-00009 · doi:10.1097/00000478-199810000-00009
- Kunz, 2003, Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate Gleason score?, Hum Pathol, 34, 911, 10.1016/S0046-8177(03)00338-1 · doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00338-1
- Levi, 2000, Pseudohyperplastic prostatic adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy and simple prostatectomy., Am J Surg Pathol, 24, 1039, 10.1097/00000478-200008000-00001 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200008000-00001
- Mellinger, 1967, 3rd. The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer., J Urol, 97, 331, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63039-8 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)63039-8
- Mellinger, 1977, Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma., Recent Results Cancer Res, 61-, 72
- Mosse, 2004, The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens., Am J Surg Pathol, 28, 394, 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00014 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200403000-00014
- Nelson, 1996, Prostatic carcinoma with abundant xanthomatous cytoplasm: foamy gland carcinoma., Am J Surg Pathol, 20, 419, 10.1097/00000478-199604000-00004 · doi:10.1097/00000478-199604000-00004
- Pacelli, 1998, Prostatic adenocarcinoma with glomeruloid features., Hum Pathol, 29, 543, 10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90073-9 · doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90073-9
- Pan, 2000, The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system., Am J Surg Pathol, 24, 563, 10.1097/00000478-200004000-00011 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200004000-00011
- Ro, 1990, Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies., Hum Pathol, 21, 593, 10.1016/S0046-8177(96)90004-0 · doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90004-0
- Rubin, 2004, Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients?, Am J Surg Pathol, 28, 946, 10.1097/00000478-200407000-00016 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200407000-00016
- Sehdev, 2001, Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma., Hum Pathol, 32, 494, 10.1053/hupa.2001.24322 · doi:10.1053/hupa.2001.24322
- Stamey, 1999, Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer., JAMA, 281, 1395, 10.1001/jama.281.15.1395 · doi:10.1001/jama.281.15.1395
- Tran, 2001, Prostatic foamy gland carcinoma with aggressive behavior: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural analysis., Am J Surg Pathol, 25, 618, 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00008 · doi:10.1097/00000478-200105000-00008
Cited by
Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, C., Bult, P., van Ginneken, B., & van der Laak, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26286 · Cited by 1,069
Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey
Srinidhi, C. L., Ciga, O., & Martel, A. L. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101813 · Cited by 749
Bulten, W., Pinckaers, H., van Boven, H., Vink, R., de Bel, T., van Ginneken, B., van der Laak, J., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., & Litjens, G. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30739-9 · Cited by 705
Klein, E. A., Cooperberg, M. R., Magi-Galluzzi, C., Simko, J. P., Falzarano, S. M., Maddala, T., Chan, J. M., Li, J., Cowan, J. E., Tsiatis, A. C., et al. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.004 · Cited by 659
Nagpal, K., Foote, D., Liu, Y., Chen, P.-H. C., Wulczyn, E., Tan, F., Olson, N., Smith, J. L., Mohtashamian, A., Wren, J. H., et al. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 · Cited by 495
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook, W. C., Amin, M. B., & Egevad, L. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1228-1242
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083043726
- Cited by
- 2,763
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 33.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1
- The paper
- Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook, W. C., Amin, M. B., & Egevad, L. L. (2005). The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
