CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Letter and order information in lexical access

Chambers, Susan M.·1979·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
DOI 10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90136-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90136-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Barron, 1974, The effect of orthographic structure and lexical meaning on same-different judgements, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 566, 10.1080/14640747408400449 · DOI
  2. Broerse, 1966, The information value of initial letters in the identification of words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 441, 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80058-0 · DOI
  3. Bruner, 1958, A note on the informativeness of parts of words, Language and Speech, 1, 98, 10.1177/002383095800100203 · DOI
  4. Carr, 1976, Target position and practice in the identification of letters in varying contexts: A word superiority effect, Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 412, 10.3758/BF03199401 · DOI
  5. Chambers, 1975, Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task, Memory and Cognition, 3, 549, 10.3758/BF03197530 · DOI
  6. Dolinsky, 1973, Word fragments as recall cues: Roles of syllables, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 272, 10.1037/h0033880 · DOI
  7. Eriksen, 1974, The importance of being first, a tachistoscopic study of the contribution of each letter to the recognition of four-letter words, Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 66, 10.3758/BF03205830 · DOI
  8. Estes, 1975, The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 122, 10.1037/0096-3445.104.2.122 · DOI
  9. Forster, 1973, Lexical access and naming time, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627, 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Haslerud, 1957, On the redintegrative perception of words, American Journal of Psychology, 70, 97, 10.2307/1419236 · DOI
  11. Havens, 1964, Structural features of competitive responses, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 75, 10.2466/pms.1964.19.1.75 · DOI
  12. Horowitz, 1968, Word fragments as aids to recall: The organisation of a word, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 219, 10.1037/h0025384 · DOI
  13. Lakner, 1974, Recognition of numerals imbedded in words, pronounceable nonwords, and random sequences of letters, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1086, 10.1037/h0037365 · DOI
  14. Mason, 1975, Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 146, 10.1037/0096-3445.104.2.146 · DOI
  15. Massaro, D. W., Venezky, E. L., & Taylor, G. A. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency and visual processing of letter strings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press. · DOI
  16. Mayzner, 1965, Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations, Psychonomic Monograph supplements, 1, 13
  17. Meyer, 1974, Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition, Memory & Cognition, 2, 309, 10.3758/BF03209002 · DOI
  18. Miller, 1957, The reconstruction of mutilated English texts, Information and Control, 1, 38, 10.1016/S0019-9958(57)90061-X · DOI
  19. Morton, 1964, The effects of context on the visual duration threshold for words, British Journal of Psychology, 55, 165, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb02716.x · DOI
  20. Morton, 1969, Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological Review, 76, 165, 10.1037/h0027366 · DOI
  21. Pillsbury, 1897, A study in apperception, The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 315, 10.2307/1411485 · DOI
  22. Postman, 1951, The perception of error, British Journal of Psychology, 42, 1
  23. Rice, 1975, The role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords, Memory & Cognition, 3, 513, 10.3758/BF03197523 · DOI
  24. Rubenstein, 1970, Homographic entries in the internal lexicon, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487, 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3 · DOI
  25. Rubenstein, 1971, Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645, 10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80071-3 · DOI
  26. Taft, 1976, Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607, 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2 · DOI
  27. Townsend, 1971, Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix, Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 40, 10.3758/BF03213026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 137

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
225-241
ISSN
0022-5371
DOI
10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90136-1
Cited by
137
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review