Cited by 330Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Assessment of Functional Gastrointestinal Disease: The Bowel Disease Questionnaire

Open access
TALLEY, NICHOLAS J., PHILLIPS, SIDNEY F., WILTGEN, CHRISTINE M., ZINSMEISTER, ALAN R., MELTON, L. JOSEPH·1990·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

A need exists for a self-report questionnaire that reliably and accurately measures symptoms and that distinguishes patients with functional gastrointestinal disease from those with other conditions. We have developed such an instrument, the bowel disease questionnaire, and herein describe details of its discriminatory validity. Data from 399 subjects were analyzed. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were ultimately diagnosed as having functional gastrointestinal disease (82 with the irritable bowel syndrome and 33 with functional dyspepsia) or organic gastrointestinal disease (N = 101). There were 145 healthy control subjects and 38 patients with a psychiatric disease, somatoform disorder (which includes those with a diagnosis of hypochrondriasis, psychogenic pain, and somatization or conversion disorder). All subjects completed the questionnaire before undergoing an independent diagnostic assessment by experienced physicians. Functional gastrointestinal disease could be distinguished from organic disease, somatoform disorder, and health by using models derived from logistic discriminant analysis. With use of these models, the estimated probability of functional gastrointestinal disease was then calculated. Descriptive symptom scores were of less value than the scores derived from the data sets by logistic discriminant analysis. Age did not significantly affect the responses to the questionnaire items. We conclude that, in the population studied, the bowel disease questionnaire is a valid measure of symptoms of functional gastrointestinal disease, and this instrument may have clinical and research applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62169-7

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional GI disorders, anxiety, and depression were excluded by validated screening questionnaires, a clinical interview, and a physical examination.

    “Functional GI disorders, anxiety, and depression were excluded by validated screening questionnaires (46), a clinical interview, and a physical examination.”

    From Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1, yohimbine, and nitrergic modulation on sympathetic and parasympathetic activity in humans (2008) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Conclusion (p. 12) says the bowel disease questionnaire could distinguish functional gastrointestinal disorders from other conditions, supporting its use as a screening instrument. The paper does not establish it as a validated screen for anxiety or depression; the appendix (p. 22) lists depression as a symptom item, not a diagnosis. The citation is attached to the questionnaires, so the clinical interview and physical examination are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Talley Bowel Disease Questionnaire is a reliable and valid measure of GI symptoms.

    “The Talley BDQ has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of GI symptoms (31).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]4. Prognostic Aspects With Particular Reference to a Subgroup With Dyspepsia ofUnknown Cause (Essential Dyspepsia). Thesis, University ofSydney, Sydney, Australia, 1986
  2. [18]18. Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Bruce B, Zinsmeister AR, Wiltgen C, Melton LJ III: Multisystem complaints in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol (in press)
  3. [19]19. Harrell FE Jr: The LOGIST procedure. In SUGI Supplementary Library User's Guide. Version 5 edition. Edited by RP Hastings. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute, 1986, pp 269-293

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TALLEY, N. J., PHILLIPS, S. F., WILTGEN, C. M., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., & MELTON, L. J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-11
Volume
65
Issue
11
Pages
1456-1479
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140255850
Cited by
330
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
functional gastrointestinal disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, somatoform disorders, health anxiety, psychogenic pain, conversion disorder, somatization, diagnostic validity, logistic discriminant analysis, symptom assessment, questionnaire development
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Somatoform Disorders, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review