Cited by 151Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging the mental components of a planning task

Abstract

The Tower of London task (TOL) has been widely used to assess the ability to plan. We used H(2)O(15)-positron emission tomography to isolate some of the cognitive components of the task. Ten male volunteers were scanned twice in each of six conditions. In two conditions (plan) the subjects had to plan the best solution to TOL problems. In two other conditions (plan-control) the subjects were required to generate four moves without being constrained by a goal. In plan and plan-control tasks the subjects either planned the moves and then executed them (MOVE conditions) or imagined the necessary moves (IMAGINE conditions). The plan and plan-control tasks were matched for the working memory load and "initial thinking time". A visuomotor control task and rest served as baseline conditions. Performance on the plan tasks, in contrast to the baseline conditions, was associated with activation in the dorsal prefrontal cortex, premotor and parietal cortex, and cerebellum. Performance of the plan-control tasks was associated with activation of the same areas. Contrasting the plan with the plan-control tasks revealed no residual activation in the prefrontal cortex. These data show that the activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the TOL can be accounted for by the components of generating, selecting and/or remembering mental moves. The task of relating the moves to the goal involves a comparison with a representation of the goal in posterior association areas. We did not find e…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00109-3

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Anderson, 1994, Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man. A PET study, Brain, 117, 1073, 10.1093/brain/117.5.1073 · DOI
  2. Baker, 1996, Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task, Neuropsychologia, 34, 515, 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00133-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brandt, 1997, Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the contents of the visual scene, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27, 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dehaene, 1997, A heirachical neuronal network for planning behaviour, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 13 293, 13 298, 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13293 · DOI
  5. Deiber, 1998, Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography, Neuroimage, 7, 73, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0314 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Elliott, 1997, Prefrontal dysfunction in depressed patients performing a complex planning task: a study using positron emission tomography, Psychological Medicine, 27, 931, 10.1017/S0033291797005187 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Elliott, 1997, Prefrontal dysfunction in depressed patients performing a complex planning task: a study using positron emission tomography, Psychological Medicine, 27, 931, 10.1017/S0033291797005187 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Elliott, 1997, Differential neural response to positive and negative feedback in planning and guessing tasks, Neuropsychologia, 35, 1395, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00055-9 · DOI
  9. Elliott, 1998, Abnormal neural response to feedback on planning and guessing tasks in patients with unipolar depression, Psychological Medicine, 28, 559, 10.1017/S0033291798006709 · DOI
  10. Friston, 1991, Comparing functional PET images: the assessment of significant change, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 11, 690, 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.122 · DOI
  11. Friston, 1995, Spatial registration and normalisation of images, Human Brain Mapping, 2, 165, 10.1002/hbm.460030303 · DOI
  12. Friston, 1990, The relationship between global and local changes in PET scans, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 10, 458, 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.88 · DOI
  13. Goel, 1995, Are the frontal lobes implicated in ‘planning’ functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi, Neuropsychologia, 33, 623, 10.1016/0028-3932(95)90866-P · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hodgson, 2000, The strategic control of gaze direction in the Tower of London task, Journal Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1, 10.1162/089892900562499 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hodgson, 1999, Eye movements and spatial working memory in Parkinson's disease, Neuropsychologia, 37, 927, 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00151-1 · DOI
  16. Holmes, 1998, Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 22, 324, 10.1097/00004728-199803000-00032 · DOI
  17. Humes, 1997, Towers of Hanoi and London: reliability and validity of two executive function tasks, Assessment, 4, 249, 10.1177/107319119700400305 · DOI
  18. Jason, 1985, Gesture fluency after focal cortical lesions, Neuropsychologia, 23, 463, 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90002-8 · DOI
  19. Jenkins, 1997, The effect of movement frequency on cerebral activation: a positron emission tomography study, Journal of Neurol Science, 151, 195, 10.1016/S0022-510X(97)00145-7 · DOI
  20. Johns, L.C., The effects of prefrontal damage in patients with surgical excisions, closed head injury, and gun-shot wounds, PhD thesis. Oxford: University of Oxford, 1996.
  21. Johnsrude, I.S., Owen, A.M., Crane, J., Milner, B., Evans, A.C. A cognitive activation study of memory for spatial relationships. Neuropsychologia, 1999; 37: 829–841. · DOI
  22. Jones-Gotman, 1977, Design fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions, Neuropsychologia, 15, 653, 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90070-7 · DOI
  23. Jonides, 1998, Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 8410, 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8410 · DOI
  24. Jueptner, 1997, Anatomy of motor learning. II. Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error, Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 1325, 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1325 · DOI
  25. Jueptner, 1996, The sensory guidance of movement: a comparison of the cerebellum and basal ganglia, Experimental Brain Research, 112, 462, 10.1007/BF00227952 · DOI
  26. Kim, 1994, Activation of a cerebellar output nucleus during cognitive processing, Science, 265, 949, 10.1126/science.8052851 · DOI
  27. Konishi, 1999, Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI, Brain, 122, 981, 10.1093/brain/122.5.981 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kosslyn, 1995, The cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery, Neuropsychologia, 33, 1335, 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00067-D · DOI
  29. Kosslyn, 1997, Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study, Neurimage, 6, 320, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0295 · DOI
  30. Krams, 1997, Cerebellar and basal ganglia activation during visually guided and memory guided movements, Neurimage, 5, s262
  31. Morris, 1993, Neural correlates of planning ability: frontal lobe activation during the Tower of London test, Neuropsychologia, 31, 1367, 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90104-8 · DOI
  32. Morris, 1997, The effect of goal-subgoal conflict on planning ability after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in humans, Neuropsychologia, 35, 1147, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00009-2 · DOI
  33. Morris, 1997, Planning ability after frontal and temporal lobe lesions in humans: The effects of selection equivocation and working memory load, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 1007, 10.1080/026432997381330 · DOI
  34. Morris, 1995, Problem solving in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in planning ability, Schizophrenia Research, 14, 235, 10.1016/0920-9964(94)00044-9 · DOI
  35. Nobre, 1999, Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 11, 10.1038/4513 · DOI
  36. Owen, 1990, Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man, Neuropsychologia, 28, 1021, 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90137-D · DOI
  37. Owen, 1998, Abnormal basal ganglia outflow in Parkinson's disease identified with PET. Implications for higher cortical functions, Brain, 121, 949, 10.1093/brain/121.5.949 · DOI
  38. Owen, 1996, Planning and spatial working memory: a positron emission tomography study in humans, European Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 353, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01219.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Owen, 1995, Visuo-spatial short-term recognition memory and learning after temporal lobe excisions, frontal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man, Neuropsychologia, 33, 1, 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00098-A · DOI
  40. Pantelis, 1997, Frontal-striatal cognitive deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia, Brain, 120, 1823, 10.1093/brain/120.10.1823 · DOI
  41. Paus, 1996, Location and function of the human frontal eye field: a selective review, Neuropsychologia, 34, 475, 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00134-4 · DOI
  42. Petit, 1997, Dissociation of saccade-related and pursuit-related activation in human frontal eye fields as revealed by fMRI, Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3386, 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3386 · DOI
  43. Price, 1997, Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments, Neuroimage, 5, 261, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0269 · DOI
  44. Price, 1997, Subtractions, conjunctions, and interactions in experimental design of activation studies, Human Brain Mapping, 5, 264, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<264::AID-HBM11>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  45. Shallice, 1982, Specific impairments of planning, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 298, 199, 10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Stephan, 1996, Motor imagery — anatomical representation and electrophysiological characteristics, Neurochemistry Research, 21, 1105, 10.1007/BF02532421 · DOI
  47. Sweeney, 1996, Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory, Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 454, 10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.454 · DOI
  48. Ward, 1997, Planning and problem-solving using the five disc Tower of London, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127, 49, 10.1080/027249897392224 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Rowe, J. B., Owen, A. M., Johnsrude, I. S., & Passingham, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Rowe, J.B.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
315-327
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154935260
Cited by
151
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (077029)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
Tower of London task, planning, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, mental imagery, goal-directed behavior, visuomotor control, cerebellum, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, path evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Male, Memory, Mental Processes, Problem Solving, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review