Cited by 166Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical researchMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serum allopregnanolone in women with postpartum “blues”

Nappi, R·2001·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective To relate serum allopregnanolone and progesterone levels postpartum to maternity "blues." Methods Forty primiparous, healthy, married women (24-39 years of age; at least 13 years of education) who delivered healthy neonates in the Department of Obstetrics at the University of Pavia entered the present study. Blood samples were drawn at 8:30 AM on postpartum day 3 for measurements of serum allopregnanolone, progesterone, cortisol, prolactin, and estradiol. On the same day, every woman was interviewed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression for psychometric testing and completed a self-administered version of the Stein Questionnaire for symptoms of the "blues." Results Eighteen of 40 women (45%) experienced maternity "blues" (12 who delivered vaginally and six who delivered by cesarean). Serum allopregnanolone levels were significantly lower in those women experiencing postpartum "blues" with respect to euthymic women (1.1 +/- 0.4 versus 2.3 +/- 1.0 nmol/L; P .058). Allopregnanolone and progesterone levels correlated significantly in euthymic women (r =.648; P =.001) but not in those with postpartum "blues" (r =.317; P =.199). There was a significant negative correlation between the Hamilton score and levels of serum allopregnanolone (r = -.62; P =.001) and progesterone (r = -.36; P =.024). Conclusion Serum allopregnanolone levels were detectable postpartum and were significantly decreased in women with maternity "blues."

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01112-1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Nappi, R.
Affiliations
University of Siena (IT)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2001-01
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
77-80
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004123621
Cited by
166
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
allopregnanolone, postpartum blues, postpartum depression, progesterone, serum steroid hormones, primiparous women, cortisol, prolactin, estradiol, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnanolone, Progesterone, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review