Cited by 38Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Endogenous plasma testosterone levels and commission errors in women: a preliminary report

BJORK, J, MOELLER, F, DOUGHERTY, D, SWANN, A·2001·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

A correlation between elevated testosterone and aggressive behavior has been demonstrated in animals and to a lesser degree in humans, primarily in the context of dominance. Some aggression, namely non-premeditated aggression, is characterized by impaired impulse control. Real-world aggressive histories and self-reported impulsivity have correlated with commission errors (failures to withhold responses to nontarget stimuli) in versions of the continuous performance test (CPT). To begin exploring whether testosterone may play a role in aggression due more to a direct relationship with impaired impulse control, we related plasma total testosterone concentrations of 27 psychiatrically healthy women to commission errors in two variants of the CPT - with and without interstimulus distracters. Controlling for age and IQ, testosterone did not relate to rates of correct detections in either task, but correlated positively with commission errors in the distracter CPT variant. In light of the fact previous studies find commission errors on the CPT are associated with impulsivity, the results of this study support a positive relationship between testosterone and impulsivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00474-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In women, testosterone administration appears to improve verbal fluency, verbal learning and memory, while response inhibition performance decreases.

    “Further, verbal fluency, verbal learning and memory appear to improve with administration of T in women (Davison et al., 2011; Drake et al., 2000), whereas response inhibition performance decreases (Bjork et al., 2001).”

    From Reproductive steroids and ADHD symptoms across the menstrual cycle (2018) · cites this paper as Bjork et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BJORK, J., MOELLER, F., DOUGHERTY, D., & SWANN, A.
Affiliations
Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
MOELLER, F
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
73
Issue
1-2
Pages
217-221
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006738234
Cited by
38
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA 12046, R01AA012046)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
testosterone, plasma testosterone, impulsivity, commission errors, continuous performance test, women, distractors, impulse control, aggression
MeSH terms
Aggression, Arousal, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Retention, Psychology, Serial Learning, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review