Cited by 11Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDietary Effects on HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Operant responding for dietary protein in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus)

Dibattista, DAVID·1999·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Golden hamsters housed in operant chambers over a period of weeks had ad lib access to a maintenance diet that was either nutritionally complete (NCMD) or protein-free (PFMD), and they were required to press a lever on a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule to obtain 20-mg high-protein pellets. As the FR requirement increased, hamsters maintained on the NCMD made fewer lever presses and ate fewer pellets, and at the highest FR levels, they earned very few pellets. In contrast, hamsters maintained on PFMD increased the number of lever presses as the FR requirement increased, and they only slightly reduced the number of pellets eaten. Even at the highest FR requirement levels, PFMD hamsters still derived an average of 11-12% of total calories from protein, a level of intake that is either adequate for adult hamsters, or very nearly so. Previous research has shown that hamsters make adaptive behavioural adjustments in response to time-restricted access to dietary protein, and the present findings demonstrate that protein-restricted hamsters that must press a lever to obtain protein-rich pellets also make adaptive behavioural adjustments when challenged with increases in the FR requirement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00043-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein restriction induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation.

    “Protein restriction also induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dibattista, D.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dibattista, DAVID
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-08
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
95-98
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083003658
Cited by
11
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
dietary protein, protein restriction, operant responding, fixed-ratio schedules, lever pressing, dietary intake, protein intake, adaptive behavior, golden hamster
MeSH terms
Animals, Energy Intake, Conditioning, Operant, Dietary Proteins, Food Preferences, Cricetinae, Male, Mesocricetus, Motivation, Nutritional Requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review