Cited by 22Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Role of learning in the selection of dietary protein in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus)

DiBattista, David, Mercier, Sharon·1999·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were kept for several weeks on maintenance diets (MDs) that were either nutritionally complete or protein deficient, and had periodic access to protein-free and high-protein conditioning diets (CDs) with marker flavors (anise and clove). In Experiment 1, protein-restricted hamsters came to prefer the flavor of high-protein CDs but did not prefer unflavored high-protein CD. Thus, hamsters learned to select dietary protein by attending to the flavor of the CD. In Experiment 2, a within-subjects design was used, and MDs also had marker flavors (garlic and sage). Hamsters came to prefer the flavor of high-protein CD when protein restricted, and they showed this preference even in the absence of protein restriction if reexposed for only 90 min to merely the flavor of a protein-deficient MD. Thus, learned associations between the flavor and the usual postingestional consequences of a recently ingested MD can affect short-term dietary protein selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.113.3.574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein restriction induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation.

    “Protein restriction also induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiBattista, D., & Mercier, S.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1999
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
574-586
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2034730522
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
flavor preference, protein restriction, anise, Syzygium aromaticum, garlic, sage, food choice, golden hamster
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetite Regulation, Association Learning, Dietary Proteins, Flavoring Agents, Food Preferences, Cricetinae, Male, Mesocricetus, Diet, Protein-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review