CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 975

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global Assessment of Functioning

Hall, Richard C.W.·1995·Psychosomatics
DOI 10.1016/s0033-3182(95)71666-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF. The two scales were compared for reliability and validity. Raters who had different training levels assigned hospital admission and discharge GAF scores from patient charts. Intraclass correlation coefficients for admission GAF scores were higher for raters who used the modified GAF (0.81), compared with raters who used the original GAF (0.62). Validity studies showed a high correlation (0.80) between the two sets of scores. The modified GAF also correlated well with Zung Depression scores (-0.73). The modified GAF may be particularly useful when interrater reliability needs to be maximum and/or when persons with varying skills and employment backgrounds--and without much GAF training--must rate patients. Because of the increased structure, the modified GAF may also be more resistant to rater bias.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0033-3182(95)71666-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Westermeyer, 1991, Problems with managed psychiatric care without a psychiatrist-manager, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 42, 1221
  2. Thompson, 1992, Initial level of care and clinical status in a managed mental health program, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 43, 599
  3. McGlashan, 1984, The chestnut lodge follow-up study II. Long-term outcome of schizophrenia and the affective disorders, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 41, 586, 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790170060007 · DOI
  4. Pfeiffer, 1990, An analysis of methodology in follow-up studies of adult inpatient psychiatric treatment, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 41, 1315

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 975

Metadata

Authors
Hall, R. C. W.
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
267-275
ISSN
0033-3182
DOI
10.1016/s0033-3182(95)71666-8
Cited by
975
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review