Cited by 119Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementAortic Thrombus and Embolism

Long-term results after surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia

Klempnauer, Jürgen, Grothues, Frank, Bektas, Hueseyin, Pichlmayr, Rudolf·1997·Surgery

Abstract

Background Acute mesenteric ischemia is associated with high mortality rates, and little is known about the long-term prognosis of patients after initially successful surgical intervention.Methods Ninety patients were treated by vascular reconstruction or bowel resection, or both, between 1972 and 1993. The overall mortality was 66%. The outcomes and rehabilitational statuses of those 31 patients who were discharged from the hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Anticoagulation consisted of vitamin K antagonists in patients with venous thrombosis and arterial embolism or inhibition of thrombocyte aggregation in patients with arterial thrombosis and nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia.Results In 31 patients discharged from the hospital venous thrombosis, arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, and nonocclusive disease occurred in 19, 5, 5, and 2 patients, respectively. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 70% and 50% and mainly related to cardiovascular comorbidity and malignant disease. Only one patient died after a recurrent attack of arterial mesenteric thrombosis. Twenty percent of the patients suffered from chronic short bowel syndrome after extensive bowel resection, but none required permanent parenteral nutrition.Conclusions Under appropriate anticoagulation there is a remarkably low risk of recurrent mesenteric ischemia. The impaired life expectancy of long-surviving patients is mainly due to cardiovascular comorbidity and malignancies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90351-2

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Klempnauer et al. found in a long-term study that patients who survive extensive bowel resection have 2-year and 5-year survival rates of 70% and 50% respectively.

    “Klempnauer et al[127] did a long-term study on those patients and found that their 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 70% and 50% respectively[127].”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [127]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klempnauer, J., Grothues, F., Bektas, H., & Pichlmayr, R.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
239-243
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000167599
Cited by
119
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, long-term prognosis, vascular reconstruction, bowel resection, anticoagulation, vitamin K antagonists, venous thrombosis, arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, survival, cardiovascular comorbidity, cancer
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Anticoagulants, Body Weight, Cause of Death, Embolism, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Prognosis, Recurrence, Splanchnic Circulation, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Colitis, Ischemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review