The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
Saliency, attention, and visual search: An information theoretic approach
Bruce, N. D. B., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2009) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/9.3.5 · Cited by 855
Visual Salience Affects Performance in a Working Memory Task
Fine, M. S., & Minnery, B. S. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5503-08.2009 · Cited by 115
Introducing a Bayesian model of selective attention based on active inference
Mirza, M. B., Adams, R. A., Friston, K., & Parr, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50138-8 · Cited by 83
Rosenholtz, R. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.985 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenholtz, R.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3157-3163
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006902234
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00077-2
- The paper
- Rosenholtz, R. (1999). A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00077-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
