Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters

Leeming, R., Ball, A., Ashbolt, N., Nichols, P.·1996·Water Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00011-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sterols derived from canid feces are characterized by very high levels of cholesterol and only trace amounts, if any, of cholesterol-derived 5β-stanols (coprostanol and epicoprostanol) because canids lack the gut microbiota responsible for producing these compounds.

    “Sterols derived from canid feces are characterized by very high levels of cholesterol, and only trace amounts (if any) of cholesterol-derived 5β-stanols (coprostanol and epicoprostanol) as canids lack the gut microbiota responsible for producing these compounds (38).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Abdullah, 1995, Environmental pollution in Malaysia—trends and prospects, Trac.—Trends in Analytical Chem., 14, 191, 10.1016/0165-9936(95)91369-4 · DOI
  2. Bartlett, 1987, Degradation of coprostanol in an experimental system, Mar. Poll. Bull., 18, 27, 10.1016/0025-326X(87)90653-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cabelli, 1983, A marine recreational water quality criterion consistent with indicator concepts and risk analysis, Res. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 55, 259
  4. Coleman, 1957, Intestinal sterols. IV. Δ7 coprostenol, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 71, 287, 10.1016/0003-9861(57)90037-1 · DOI
  5. Eyssen, 1973, Biohydrogenation of sterols by Eubacterium ATCC 21,408—Nova species, Eur. J. Biochem., 36, 411, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02926.x · DOI
  6. Ferezou, 1978, Daily elimination of faecal sterols by humans, Digestion, 18, 201, 10.1159/000198203 · DOI
  7. Hatcher, 1979, Sewage contamination in the New York Bight, Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 1225, 10.1021/es60158a015 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kay, 1980, Reduction of coliform bacteria in two upland reservoirs: The significance of distance decay relationships, Water Res., 14, 305, 10.1016/0043-1354(80)90076-7 · DOI
  9. Laureillard, 1993, Biomarkers in organic matter produced in estuaries: a case study of the Krka estuary (Adriatic Sea) using the sterol marker series, Mar. Chem., 43, 247, 10.1016/0304-4203(93)90230-L · DOI
  10. LeBlanc, 1992, The geochemistry of coprostanol in waters and surface sediments from Narragansett Bay, Estuarine, Coast Shelf Sci., 34, 439, 10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80116-7 · DOI
  11. Leeming, 1994, Distinguishing between human and animal sources of faecal pollution, Chemistry in Australia, 61, 434
  12. Martin, 1973, Nature of faecal sterols and intestinal bacterial flora, Lipids, 8, 208, 10.1007/BF02544637 · DOI
  13. McFetters, 1986, Injured coliforms in drinking water, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 1, 10.1128/AEM.51.1.1-5.1986 · DOI
  14. Morris, 1991, The EC bathing water virology standard: Is it realistic?, Water Sci. Tech., 2, 49, 10.2166/wst.1991.0028 · DOI
  15. Murtaugh, 1967, Sterols as a measure of faecal pollution, J. Water. Pollut. Contr. Fed., 39, 404
  16. Nichols, 1992, Survey of Sydney's coastal environment, Australian Water and Wastewater Association Journal, Water, 19, 32
  17. Nichols, 1993, Comparison of the abundance of the fecal sterol coprostanol and fecal bacterial groups in inner-shelf waters and sediments near Sydney, Australia, J. Chromatogr., 643, 189, 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80552-J · DOI
  18. Nishimura, 1982, 5β-Isomers of stanols and stanones as potential markers of sedimentary organic quality and depositional paleoenvironments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 46, 423, 10.1016/0016-7037(82)90233-2 · DOI
  19. Nishimura, 1977, The occurrence of stanols in various living organisms and the behaviour of sterols in contemporary sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41, 379, 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90265-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rhodes, 1988, Survival of Escherichia coli in estuarine environments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 54, 2902, 10.1128/AEM.54.12.2902-2907.1988 · DOI
  21. Sherwin, 1993, Coprostanol (5β-cholestan-3β-ol) in lagoonal sediments and mussels of Venice, Italy, Mar. Poll. Bull., 26, 501, 10.1016/0025-326X(93)90467-X · DOI
  22. Subbiah, 1972, Nature of sterols excreted by non-human primates: faecal sterols of baboon and Rhesus monkey, Int. J. Biochem., 3, 430, 10.1016/0020-711X(72)90094-8 · DOI
  23. Sugano, 1967, Steroid 14C excretion in chickens following intravenous administration of cholesterol 4-14C in lipoproteins, Agr. Biol. Chem., 31, 378, 10.1080/00021369.1967.10858819 · DOI
  24. Switzer-Howse, 1978, Fecal sterol studies: Sample processing and microbial degradation, Sc. Ser., 89, 1
  25. Venkatesan, 1989, Sterols in ocean sediments: novel tracers to examine habitats of cetaceans, pinnipeds, penguins and humans, Marine Biology, 102, 431, 10.1007/BF00438343 · DOI
  26. Venkatesan, 1990, Sedimentary coprostanol as an index of sewage addition in Santa Monica Basin, Southern California, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 208, 10.1021/es00072a009 · DOI
  27. Walker, 1982, Coprostanol as an indicator of faecal pollution, CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control., 10, 91, 10.1080/10643388209381695 · DOI
  28. Writer, 1995, Sewage contamination in the upper Mississippi River as measured by the faecal sterol, coprostanol, Water Res., 29, 1427, 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00304-P · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leeming, R., Ball, A., Ashbolt, N., & Nichols, P.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2893-2900
ISSN
0043-1354
Cited by
383
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review