CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 242Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFirm Innovation and Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts

Autio, E.·1997·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00906-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00906-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Allen, 1990, Why the future is not what it was: New models of evolution, Futures, 555–570
  2. Amendola, 1990, The behavior of the innovating firm: Relations to the environment, Research Policy, 19, 419, 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90050-G · DOI
  3. Autio, 1995, Structures and dynamics of technological systems: A conceptual model, Technology in Society, 17, 365, 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00022-J · DOI
  4. Balconi, 1993, The notion of industry and knowledge bases: The evidence of steel and mini-mills, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 10.1093/icc/2.1.471 · DOI
  5. Boisot, 1995, Is your firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategies of firms, Research Policy, 24, 489, 10.1016/S0048-7333(94)00779-9 · DOI
  6. Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915 · DOI
  7. Chidamber, 1994, Research retrospective of innovation inception and success: The technology-push, demand-pull question, International Journal of Technology Management, 9, 94, 10.1504/IJTM.1994.025565 · DOI
  8. Christensen, 1995, Asset profiles for technological innovation, Research Policy, 24, 727, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00794-8 · DOI
  9. Churchill, 1983, The five stages of small business growth, Harvard Business Review
  10. Conner, 1991, A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?, Journal of Management, 17, 121, 10.1177/014920639101700109 · DOI
  11. Covin, 1991, Strategies, styles, and structures of small product innovative firms in high and low technology industries, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1, 39, 10.1016/1047-8310(90)90012-S · DOI
  12. Debackere, 1994, Science and industry: A theory of networks and paradigms, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 6, 21, 10.1080/09537329408524150 · DOI
  13. Faulkner, 1994, Making sense of diversity: Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies, Research Policy, 23, 673, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90017-5 · DOI
  14. Feeser, 1990, Founding strategy and performance: A comporison of high and low growth high tech firms, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 87, 10.1002/smj.4250110202 · DOI
  15. Forrest, 1992, Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organizations: Experiences in the biotechnology industry, R&D Management, 22, 41, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00787.x · DOI
  16. Foss, 1993, Theories of the firm: Contractual and competence perspectives, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3, 127, 10.1007/BF01213830 · DOI
  17. Garud, 1993, Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems' open systems strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 351, 10.1002/smj.4250140504 · DOI
  18. Garud, 1995, Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 93, 10.1002/smj.4250160919 · DOI
  19. Gibbons, 1974, The roles of science in technological innovation, Research Policy, 3, 220, 10.1016/0048-7333(74)90008-0 · DOI
  20. Gould, 1984, New firms and rural industrialization in East Anglia, Regional Studies, 18, 189, 10.1080/09595238400185191 · DOI
  21. Grandori, 1995, Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms, and forms, Organization Studies, 16, 183, 10.1177/017084069501600201 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hameri, 1993, Technical change, innovations, and technological causality: An empirical and philosophical inquiry, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 61
  23. Henderson, 1990, Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9, 10.2307/2393549 · DOI
  24. Hippel, 1976, The dominant role of users in the scientific instrumentation process, Research Policy, 5, 212, 10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7 · DOI
  25. Kamshad, 1997, Measuring the value of growth: The SME dilemma, Journal of Economic Literature
  26. Langlois, 1992, Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries, Research Policy, 21, 297, 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90030-8 · DOI
  27. Lumme, 1994, The growth and funding mechanisms of new, technology-based companies, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 20
  28. Nelson, 1994, The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting organization, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 47, 10.1093/icc/3.1.47 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Pavitt, 1984, Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · DOI
  30. Pavitt, 1990, What do we know about the strategic management of technology?, California Management Review, 17, 10.2307/41166614 · DOI
  31. Pavitt, 1989, Technological accumulation, diversification and organization in UK companies, 1945–1983, Management Science, 35, 81, 10.1287/mnsc.35.1.81 · DOI
  32. Roberts, 1968, Entrepreneurship and technology: A basic study of innovators, Research Management, 11, 249, 10.1080/00345334.1968.11755911 · DOI
  33. Roberts, 1991, The technological base of the new enterprise, Research Policy, 20, 283, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90090-D · DOI
  34. Roberts, 1986, The process of technology transfer to the new biomedical and pharmaceutical firm, Research Policy, 15, 107, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90006-5 · DOI
  35. Rothwell, 1983, Innovation and firm size: The case of dynamic complementarity, Journal of General Management, 8, 5, 10.1177/030630708300800301 · DOI
  36. Rothwell, 1991, External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe, Technovation, 11, 93, 10.1016/0166-4972(91)90040-B · DOI
  37. Rothwell, 1992, Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s, R&D Management, 22, 221, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x · DOI
  38. Roure, 1991, Predictors of success in new, technology-based ventures, Engineering Management Review, 69
  39. Sahal, 1985, Technology guide-posts and innovation avenues, Research Policy, 14, 61, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90015-0 · DOI
  40. Scott, 1987, Five stages of growth in small business, Long Range Planning, 20, 10.1016/0024-6301(87)90071-9 · DOI
  41. Suárez, 1995, Dominant designs and the survival of firms, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 415, 10.1002/smj.4250160602 · DOI
  42. Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Tidd, 1995, Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks: The case of home automation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 307, 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00026-P · DOI
  44. Tiler, 1993, Business expansion through entrepreneurship: The influence of internal and external barriers to growth, International Journal of Technology Management, Special Publication on Small Firms and Innovation, 8, 119
  45. Wade, 1995, Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 111, 10.1002/smj.4250160920 · DOI
  46. Webster, 1976, A model of new venture initiation, Academy of Management Review, 1, 23, 10.5465/AMR.1976.4408750 · DOI
  47. Wernerfelt, 1984, A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171, 10.1002/smj.4250050207 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Autio, E.
Corresponding author
Autio, E.
ORCID
Autio, E.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
263-281
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00906-7
OpenAlex
W2049615269
Cited by
242
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
new technology-based firms, innovation networks, science-based firms, knowledge transformation, spin-offs, Silicon Valley

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review