The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Uncertainty Management Theory (UMT)22 offers a valuable complementary perspective by proposing that individuals actively seek environmental cues to interpret ambiguous situations and guide appropriate responses.”
From Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Items 201–220 of 220
Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations.
Vermunt, R. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.621 · Cited by 62
The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest
Vermunt, R. C., Wit, A., van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (1996) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf02198075 · Cited by 60
Self-citationSocial uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decisions in groups
Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R., & Sawyer, J. E. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90027-7 · Cited by 55
Agar, S., Meyer, J. P., Bobocel, D. R., & Irving, P. G. (1998) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2002_5 · Cited by 51
Organizational Commitment and Job Insecurity in a Changing Public Service Organization
Hartley, A. L. J. (1998) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/135943298398745 · Cited by 44
A social influence model of employee theft: Beyond the fraud triangle.
Greenberg, J. (1997) · Cited by 42
Self-Evaluation Motives and Uncertainty Orientation: Asking the "Who" Question
Roney, C., & Sorrentino, R. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672952112009 · Cited by 34
van den Bos, K. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00033-x · Cited by 34
Markovsky, B. (1989) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786711 · Cited by 27
Liberatore, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315078540 · Cited by 26
Daly, J. P., & Tripp, T. M. (1996) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf02196989 · Cited by 24
van den Bos, K., van Schie, E. C. M., & Colenberg, S. (2002) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016097715802 · Cited by 22
Lind, E. (1990) · Cited by 21
Self-citationUncertainty Orientation And The Relation Between Individual Accessible Constructs and Person Memory
King, G. A., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1988) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1988.6.2.128 · Cited by 18
Toward unconfounding prediction and control: Predictionless control made possible.
Nickels, J. B., Cramer, K. M., & Gural, D. M. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0078704 · Cited by 17
Bobocel, D. R., Hing, L. S. S., Holmvall, C. M., et al. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499975.012 · Cited by 16
Effects of control deprivation on subsequent use of stereotypes
Ric, F. (1997) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224549709595444 · Cited by 13
Accepting unfairness: Temporal influence on choice.
Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1990) · Cited by 13
Constrained Egoism and Resource Management Under Uncertainty
(2015) · Garland Science eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203769560-12 · Cited by 11
Effects of Interpersonal Affect Upon Fairness Judgment
Tanaka, K., & Takimoto, S. (1997) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/1468-5884.00063 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cobb, 1995, Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of injustice in organizational change and development, Vol. 8, 243
- Cropanzano, 1991, Procedural justice and worker motivation, Vol. 5, 131
- Lind, 1992, The fairness heuristic: Rationality and “relationality” in procedural evaluations
- Sorrentino, R.M., Hodson, G.L., & Huber, G.L. (in press). Uncertainty orientation and the interpersonal context. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Stouffer, 1949, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 · Cited by 2,208
Hogg, M. A. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8 · Cited by 990
Making Sense of Life: The Existential Self Trying to Deal with Personal Uncertainty
van den Bos, K. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903333411 · Cited by 395
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 1-60
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1495078598
- Semantic Scholar
- 7a46c4f235e022d97ceca00d0cfc9e2bbf51d56f
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 220
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 103.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- fairness judgments, uncertainty, coping with uncertainty, perceived fairness, heuristic processing, organizational justice, job insecurity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
