Cited by 83Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Catatonia in Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A Medical Treatment Algorithm

Fink, Max, Taylor, Michael A., Ghaziuddin, Neera·2006·International Review of Neurobiology

Abstract

Autism is a developmental syndrome with an unknown biology and inadequate therapeutics. Assessing the elements of the syndrome for the presence of depression, psychosis, mania, or catatonia, offers opportunities for systematic intervention. Since almost all descriptions of autism highlight the presence of motor symptoms that characterize catatonia, an assessment for this eminently treatable syndrome is recommended for all patients considered to be autistic. A minimum examination includes a catatonia rating scale and for those patients with defined catatonia, a lorazepam test. For those whose catatonia responds to lorazepam, high dose lorazepam therapy is recommended. If this fails, electroconvulsive therapy is recommended. The assessment and treatment of catatonia offers positive medical therapy for the victims of autism and their families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0074-7742(05)72014-6

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benzodiazepine use in autism is relatively uncommon due to concerns of behavioral disinhibition; some anticonvulsants likely exert GABAergic effects and are used for mood stabilization; there is ongoing interest in GABAergic treatments for catatonia in autism.

    “While benzodiazepine use in autism is relatively uncommon, owing to concerns of behavioral disinhibition, some anticonvulsants that likely exert GABAergic effects are used for mood stabilization [262], and there is ongoing interest in the potential role of GABAergic treatments for catatonia in autism [263].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fink, M., Taylor, M. A., & Ghaziuddin, N.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
International Review of Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Volume
72
Pages
233-244
ISSN
0074-7742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529072181
Cited by
83
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
25.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International review of neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
catatonia, autism spectrum disorder, electroconvulsive therapy, treatment algorithm, motor symptoms, depression, psychosis, mania
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Algorithms, Anticonvulsants, Autistic Disorder, Catatonia, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Humans, Lorazepam, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review