The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chapter 1 Gender Differences in Pharmacological Response
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frezza, M., di Padova, C., Pozzato, G., Terpin, M., Baraona, E., & Lieber, C. S. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199001113220205 · Cited by 1,328
Cited by
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
Zucker, I., & Prendergast, B. J. (2020) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-020-00308-5 · Cited by 777
Gender differences in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A narrative review
Williamson, D., & Johnston, C. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.005 · Cited by 226
Tamoxifen in men: a review of adverse events
Wibowo, E., Pollock, P. A., Hollis, N., & Wassersug, R. J. (2016) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12197 · Cited by 97
Sex Differences in Clinical Features of Early, Treated Parkinson’s Disease
Augustine, E. F., Pérez, A., Dhall, R., Umeh, C. C., Videnovic, A., Cambi, F., Wills, A.-M. A., Elm, J. J., Zweig, R. M., Shulman, L. M., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133002 · Cited by 71
Hampel, H., Vergallo, A., Giorgi, F. S., Kim, S. H., Depypere, H., Graziani, M., Saidi, A., Nisticò, R., & Lista, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.06.001 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, G. D.
- Venue
- International Review of Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0074-7742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1556631311
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 79.43
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chapter 1 Gender Differences in Pharmacological Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0074-7742(08)00001-9
- The paper
- Anderson, G. D. (2008). Chapter 1 Gender Differences in Pharmacological Response. International Review of Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7742(08)00001-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
