Cited by 75Animal Genetics and ReproductionReproductive Biology and FertilityConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

The limitation of conventional breeding programs and the need and promise of assisted reproduction in nondomestic species

Lasley, B.L., Loskutoff, N.M., Anderson, G.B.·1994·Theriogenology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0093-691x(05)80057-3

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional plant propagation methods often fail to fulfill current and expected demands of efficient and cost-effective plant propagation systems due to insufficient agricultural land, long time to obtain progenies, dependence on seasons, and limitations in consistency.

    “These methods often fail to fulfill the current and expected demands of efficient and cost-effective plant propagation systems due to insufficient agricultural land, requiring a long time to obtain progenies, dependence on seasons, and limitations in the consistency of the resulting plant material [3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lasley, B. L., Loskutoff, N. M., & Anderson, G. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Theriogenology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
119-132
ISSN
0093-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070203424
Cited by
75
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theriogenology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
assisted reproduction, captive breeding, endangered species conservation, artificial insemination, embryo transfer, in vitro embryo production, cryopreservation, biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review