Cited by 2,178Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurology and Historical Studies

Speech and Brain‐Mechanisms

Wilder Penfield, Howard Roberts Lamar·1960·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

Speech and Brain-Mechanisms. By Wilder Penfield and Lamar Roberts; 1959. Princeton and New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 9$f14″ × 5$f34″, pp. 304, with many illustrations. Price: $6.00.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb76238.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penfield, W., & Lamar, H. R.
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
1960-04
Volume
1
Issue
15
Pages
581-581
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2055870134
Cited by
2,178
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 52
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
speech, neural mechanisms, speech production, cerebral cortex, aphasia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review