Cited by 225Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistic Variation and Morphology

Japanese Adults can Learn to Produce English /I/ and /l/ Accurately

Flege, James Emil, Takagi, Naoyuki, Mann, Virginia·1995·Language and Speech

Abstract

As is well known, Japanese adults who have just begun to learn English often err in producing /I/ and /l/ because their native language does not possess such liquid consonants. The aim of this study was to determine if Japanese adults eventually learn to produce /I/ and /l/ accurately in words like read and lead. Liquids spoken by 12 native Japanese speakers who had lived in the United States for an average of two years were often misidentified by native English-speaking listeners. Their productions of /I/ and /l/ also received much lower (and thus foreign-accented) ratings than did the native English speakers' liquids. On the other hand, liquids produced by native Japanese speakers who had lived in the United States for an average 21 years were identified correctly in forced-choice tests. This held true for liquids in words that had been read from a list as well as for words that had been spoken spontaneously. The ratings of liquids produced by 10 of the 12 experienced Japanese speakers fell within the range of ratings obtained for the 12 native English speakers. These findings challenge the widely accepted view that segmental production errors in a second language arise from the inevitable loss of ability to learn phonetic segments not found in the native language.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002383099503800102

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When acquiring a second language, certain phonetic distinctions are notoriously difficult to master both in speech perception and production, as shown by the difficulty of the /r-l/ distinction for native speakers of Japanese even after training.

    “When acquiring a second language, certain phonetic distinctions are notoriously difficult to master both in speech perception and production, as shown, for example, by the difficulty of the /r-l/ distinction for native speakers of Japanese, even after training (11, 78, 111, 112).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [111]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Shosen University, Tokyo
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Language and Speech
Published
1995-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
25-55
ISSN
  • 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-6053
OpenAlex
W2411353279
Cited by
225
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC00257, R01DC000257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
Japanese learners of English, liquid consonants, second language pronunciation, segmental errors, native language phonology, foreign accent, speech perception, second language acquisition
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Phonetics, Speech, Speech Acoustics, Speech Production Measurement, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review