Cited by 307Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrovascular and genetic disordersCognitive Abilities and Testing

Relation between age-related decline in intelligence and cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in healthy octogenarians: a longitudinal study

Garde, Ellen, Mortensen, Erik Lykke, Krabbe, Katja, Rostrup, Egill, Larsson, Henrik BW·2000·The Lancet

Abstract

Background White-matter hyperintensities are commonly found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of elderly people with or without dementia. Studies of the relation between severity of white-matter hyperintensities and cognitive impairment have had conflicting results. We undertook a longitudinal study of age-related decline in intellectual function and MRI at age 80 years. Methods From a cohort of 698 people born in 1914 and living in seven municipalities in Denmark, 68 healthy non-demented individuals had been tested with the Wechsler adult intelligence scale (WAIS) at ages 50, 60, and 70, and they agreed to further WAIS testing at age 80, and cerebral MRI at age 80-82 (mean age 82.3 years). We scored separately the numbers of periventricular and deep white-matter hyperintensities. Findings Scores for periventricular hyperintensities in this sample included all possible degrees of severity, but no participant scored more than 75% of maximum for deep white-matter hyperintensities. Neither type was related to the WAIS IQs of the 80-year assessment, but both were significantly associated with decline in performance IQ from age 50 to age 80 years (bivariate correlation coefficients 0.32, p=0.0087, and 0.28, p=0.0227, respectively). An analysis based on two WAIS subtests showed that the association between white-matter hyperintensities and cognitive impairment was significant only for cognitive decline in the decade 70-80 years. Interpretation Both periventricular and deep white-…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02604-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garde, E., Mortensen, E. L., Krabbe, K., Rostrup, E., & Larsson, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Garde, Ellen
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
356
Issue
9230
Pages
628-634
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2133185939
Cited by
307
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
white matter hyperintensities, age-related cognitive decline, intelligence, octogenarians, periventricular white matter hyperintensities, deep white matter hyperintensities, performance IQ, cognitive impairment, healthy older adults, longitudinal cognitive change
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Cerebral Ventricles, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Wechsler Scales, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review